Cited by 7Digestive system and related healthAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyInfant Nutrition and Health

Models for the Study of Cell Proliferation in the Developing Gastrointestinal Tract

Klein, Robert M.·1986·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Which is the best system to study in order to obtain data for the human developmental situation? While the temporal pattern of differentiation and growth in some of these species is similar to human development, there are major differences in terms of absorption of immunoglobulins. Humans and rabbits receive virtually complete passive immunity in utero, while rats receive partial immunity, and other species such as the calf, sheep, and pig receive virtually their complete passive immunity during the postnatal period. The morphological similarity of the neonatal rat and mouse small intestine to human fetal small intestine between 10 and 22 weeks adds some validity to the limited use of this model. However, the pattern of gastrointestinal differentiation late in gestation; the dependence on the postnatal period for the transfer of passive immunity; and the delayed closure of the gut are limiting factors in the use of this model comparison to the human situation. Although the opossum provides a useful model for the study of gastrointestinal development in a species with an extremely dependent, underdeveloped newborn and an extremely delayed closure of the gut, this situation is not analagous to the human fetal and neonatal pattern of gastrointestinal development. While animals such as the calf, pig, and sheep are morphologically similar to the human condition and exhibit a relatively short postnatal period of functional immunoglobulin uptake they are almost completely dependent…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1536-4801.1986.tb09122.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, R. M.
Corresponding author
Klein, Robert M.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-07
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
513-516
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2085527103
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Digestive system and related health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
gastrointestinal tract development, cell proliferation, passive immunity, immunoglobulin transfer, fetal small intestine, mouse and rat models
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Animals, Laboratory, Animals, Newborn, Cattle, Cell Division, Digestive System, Female, Gestational Age, Guinea Pigs, Cricetinae, Humans, Immunity, Maternally-Acquired, Immunoglobulins, Infant, Newborn, Intestine, Small, Models, Biological, Opossums, Organ Culture Techniques, Pregnancy, Sheep, Species Specificity, Swine, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review