Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Infection and Cholestasis in Neonates with Intestinal Resection and Long‐Term Parenteral Nutrition

Sondheimer, Judith M., Asturias, Edwin, Cadnapaphornchai, Melissa·1998·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives: This retrospective study was conducted to determine the incidence of cholestasis and liver failure in patients with intestinal resection in the neonatal period who subsequently become dependent on parenteral nutrition support and to assess the significance of associated clinical factors‐gestational age, birth weight and length; length of bowel resected; presence of ileocecal valve; enteral feeding history; and infection to the incidence and severity of cholestasis. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients in a single institution from May 1984 to February 1997 with neonatal small intestinal resection dependent on parenteral nutrition for at least 3 months. Results: Forty‐two patients fitting the inclusion criteria were the subjects of this review. Cholestasis developed in 28 (67%) while they were receiving parenteral nutrition (direct serum bilirubin more than 2mg/dl). In 21, the elevated direct bilirubin normalized while patients continued to receive parenteral nutrition. Seven patients progressed to liver failure. In 14 patients, serum direct bilirubin never rose above 2 mg/dl. The cholestatic patients did not differ from the noncholestatic in gestational age, birth weight, and length; primary diagnosis; length of bowel resected; or presence of ileocecal valve. The duration of dependence on parenteral nutrition was longer in noncholestatic (33.2 ± 9 months) than in cholestatic patients progressing to liver failure (19.4 ± 3 months) or in cholestatic patients who recovered (16.1 ± 1.9 months) (p < 0.05). Invasive fungal or bacterial infections occurred in all but one noncholestatic patient. The number of infections per patient was similar in all groups. The mean age (days) at first infection was significantly younger in cholestatic patients progressing to liver failure (28.5 ± 5) and cholestatic patients who recovered (48.2 ± 14.2) than in noncholestatic patients(167 ± 43.2) (p 0.01). Infection preceded the onset of cholestasis in all but 3 patients by an average of 13.5 days. Infecting organisms and site of first infection were similar in all patients. Conclusions: Cholestasis is common in infants with neonatal intestinal resection. Liver failure develops in 16.6%. Bacterial infection early in life characterized the cholestatic patients, and cholestasis developed shortly after the first infection in 90% of patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1536-4801.1998.tb01122.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Sondheimer, J. M., Asturias, E., & Cadnapaphornchai, M.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-08
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
131-137
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W1985640080
Cited by
248
References
0
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infection and Cholestasis in Neonates with Intestinal Resection and Long‐Term Parenteral Nutrition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1536-4801.1998.tb01122.x
The paper
Sondheimer, J. M., Asturias, E., & Cadnapaphornchai, M. (1998). Infection and Cholestasis in Neonates with Intestinal Resection and Long‐Term Parenteral Nutrition. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1536-4801.1998.tb01122.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.