The DOI matches its Crossref record.
FLORAL BIOLOGY, HUMMINGBIRD POLLINATION AND FRUIT PRODUCTION OF TRUMPET CREEPER (CAMPSIS RADICANS, BIGNONIACEAE)
Abstract
Trumpet creeper is self‐incompatible and bears long, tubular, orange flowers from June to September. Flowering peaks rapidly, then declines and continues at low levels for several weeks. The initial burst of flowering may attract pollinators that return even during subsequent reduced flowering. Most flowers open before noon and nectar production totals 110 μl of 26% sucrose equivalents per flower, an exceptionally high production for a temperate zone plant. Production ceases within 20–30 hr of flower opening, but corollas persist for several days and may serve to attract pollinators. Effective pollination reduces the period of stigma receptivity and speeds closing of stigma lobes. Only 1–9% of flowers produced mature fruits at four sites in Illinois and Missouri. Roughly 400 pollen grains had to be deposited on a receptive stigma to cause fruit development beyond an initial period of high abortion. At two sites, 17% and 89% of stigmas received over 400 pollen grains. Assuming 50% of deposited grains were from the same plant, fruit production at one site was clearly pollinator limited, that at the second site may have been. Ruby‐throated Hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) deposited ten times as much pollen per stigma per visit as honeybees (Apis mellifera) and bumblebees (Bombus spp.). Fruit set was highest where rubythroat visitation was most frequent. Trumpet creeper appears primarily adapted for hummingbird pollination, but can also be adequately pollinated by honeybees and bumblebees. This is one of the first attempts to relate pollen‐depositing capabilities of pollinators of any plant to pollen requirements for fruit production. Several characteristics suggest that trumpet creeper may be adapted to pollination at low densities (often called traplining) in its presumed original, woodland, habitat.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecosystem Services Provided by Birds
Whelan, C. J., Wenny, D. G., & Marquis, R. J. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1439.003 · Cited by 988
Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants
Vázquez, D. P., Morris, W. F., & Jordano, P. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00810.x · Cited by 599
Roulston, T. H., Cane, J. H., & Buchmann, S. L. (2000) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2000)070[0617:wgpcop]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 477
Variation Among Floral Visitors in Pollination Ability: A Precondition for Mutualism Specialization
Schemske, D. W., & Horvitz, C. C. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.225.4661.519 · Cited by 451
A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency
Ne'eman, G., Jürgens, A., Newstrom‐Lloyd, L., Potts, S. G., & Dafni, A. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2009.00108.x · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertin, R. I.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122-134
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2062675083
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FLORAL BIOLOGY, HUMMINGBIRD POLLINATION AND FRUIT PRODUCTION OF TRUMPET CREEPER (CAMPSIS RADICANS, BIGNONIACEAE). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1982.tb13241.x
- The paper
- Bertin, R. I. (1982). FLORAL BIOLOGY, HUMMINGBIRD POLLINATION AND FRUIT PRODUCTION OF TRUMPET CREEPER (CAMPSIS RADICANS, BIGNONIACEAE). American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1982.tb13241.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.