Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

R eevaluating the origin of domesticated cotton (G ossypium hirsutum; M alvaceae) using nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP s)

Brubaker, Curt L., Wendel, Jonathan F.·1994·American Journal of Botany

Abstract

The origin of domestication in Mesoamerican G. hirsutum populations is obscured by several factors, including the absence of a clearly identified wild progenitor, a complex population genetic structure, and many centuries of human‐mediated dispersal and gene flow. Phenetic and phylogenetic analyses of allelic variation at 205 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) loci were conducted in an effort to unravel this complicated history. The RFLP data, in conjunction with previously published molecular, morphological, and anthropological information, suggest that coastal Yucatan populations are truly wild rather than reestablished feral derivatives. The geographical proximity of these wild coastal populations to agronomically primitive forms of G. hirsutum implicates the Yucatan peninsula as the primary site for the earliest stages of domestication. Agronomically advanced cultigens developed in southern Mexico and Guatemala appear to have been derived from introduced Yucatan peninsular forms, thereby creating the secondary center of diversity that has traditionally been interpreted as the geographical point of origin of domesticated G. hirsutum. The gene pool of modern, improved (Upland) cultivars derives from Mexican highland populations that, in turn, trace their origins to southern Mexico and Guatemala. Gossypium hirsutum is the first tetraploid perennial surveyed for RFLP variation. Levels of RFLP variation in G. hirsutum (H T = 0.048, A = 1.24, and P = 22%) are low relative to other plant taxa, and, in contrast to the few comparable studies, levels of allozyme variation are higher than levels of RFLP variation. Despite assaying 205 loci, only six of the 23 Upland cultivars were found to have unique multilocus genotypes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1994.tb11453.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Brubaker, C. L., & Wendel, J. F.
Venue
American Journal of Botany
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-10
Volume
81
Issue
10
Pages
1309-1326
ISSN
  • 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2197
OpenAlex
W1989768495
Cited by
221
References
1
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: R eevaluating the origin of domesticated cotton (G ossypium hirsutum; M alvaceae) using nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP s). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1994.tb11453.x
The paper
Brubaker, C. L., & Wendel, J. F. (1994). R eevaluating the origin of domesticated cotton (G ossypium hirsutum; M alvaceae) using nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP s). American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1994.tb11453.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.