Cited by 27Coagulation and Flocculation StudiesWater Treatment and DisinfectionWater and Wastewater Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reducing Aluminum Residuals in Finished Water

Abstract

Pilot‐ and plant‐scale tests were conducted in Minneapolis, Minn., in an attempt to reduce aluminum residuals in the finished water. At high pH, when the predominant mode of alum coagulation is sweep coagulation, increasing the intensity of chemical mixing reduced aluminum residuals only slightly. Reducing the pH with acid was effective in reducing the residuals, but posttreatment pH adjustment with lime to stabilize the water increased its hardness. It appears that the most promising means of reducing aluminum residuals is to replace part of the alum dosage with ferric chloride. At both Minneapolis and St. Paul water treatment plants, ferric chloride, at less than half the dosage of alum, reduced the residuals and resulted in longer filter runs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1985.tb05627.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1971.tb04036.x · DOI
  2. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1982.tb04890.x · DOI
  3. Edzwald J.K., 1979, Coagulation of Humic Substances, AIChE Sym. Ser. 190, 75, 54
  4. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1965.tb01506.x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0021-9797(67)90186-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1963.tb01151.x · DOI
  7. 1969, Water Treatment Plant Design
  8. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1973.tb01933.x · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.180.4085.511 · DOI
  10. Davidson A.M., 1982, Water Supply Aluminum Concentration, Dialysis Dementia, and Effect of Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment, Lancet, 758
  11. Emery P.M.Coagulation with Ferric Chloride.AWWA Ont. Sec. Ann. Conf.(May1979).
  12. 1976, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.
  13. Matijevic E., 1973, Colloid Stability and Complex Chemistry, Jour. Colloid & Interface Sci., 43, 239
  14. Ching L.Y., 1979, Appropriate Technological Applications to the Penang Water Works, Aqua, Jour. Intl. Water Supply Assn., 1, 2
  15. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1983.tb05122.x · DOI
  16. Miller F., 1925, Public Health Repts., 20, 1417
  17. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1935.tb18470.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Qureshi, N., & Malmberg, R. H.
Venue
Journal AWWA
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-10
Volume
77
Issue
10
Pages
101-108
ISSN
  • 0003-150X (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-8833
OpenAlex
W1546473500
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Water Works Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water and Wastewater Treatment
Keywords
finished water, alum coagulation, sweep coagulation, pH adjustment, lime stabilization, ferric chloride, water hardness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review