The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Three approaches for characterizing NOM
Open accessAbstract
These techniques yield valuable insights into complex natural organic matter. Three research approaches to characterize natural organic matter (NOM) are available: (1) a nonperturbing approach, (2) an approach based on isolation–fractionation, and (3) an approach based on calculations. A nonperturbing approach has been used to assess the aromaticity and morphology of NOM. Characterization of isolated fractions has shown that the two main fractions—fulvic and hydrophilic acids—are in some points structurally different. Furthermore, reasonable estimates of several structural features of NOM have been obtained by analytical‐constraints calculations. Each approach yields valuable insights into NOM—its source and nature in watersheds, how seasonal variations affect it, and its potential to form disinfection by‐products. Each approach also yields insight into the relationship between NOM's structural and compositional properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Li, L., Gao, N., Deng, Y., Yao, J., & Zhang, K. (2012) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.026 · Cited by 485
Kampioti, A. (2002) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00470-5 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Krasner, S. W., Croué, J., Buffle, J., & Perdue, E. M.
- Venue
- Journal AWWA
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 66-79
- ISSN
- 0003-150X (ISSN-L)
- 1551-8833
- OpenAlex
- W1591015846
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three approaches for characterizing NOM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1996.tb06572.x
- The paper
- Krasner, S. W., Croué, J., Buffle, J., & Perdue, E. M. (1996). Three approaches for characterizing NOM. Journal AWWA. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1996.tb06572.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
