Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 32Nausea and vomiting managementVestibular and auditory disordersPregnancy and Medication Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness and Duration of Intramuscular Antimotion Sickness Medications

Wood, Charles D., Stewart, John J., Wood, Mary J., Mims, Malcolm·1992·The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Motion sickness inhibits gastric motility, making the oral route ineffective for medications. The intramuscular route is an effective alternative. The rotating chair was used to produce the M 111 level of motion sickness on the Graybiel Symptom Scale. The intramuscular medications given 30 minutes before rotation were compared with placebo (saline, 1 mL) for effectiveness and duration in increasing the number of tolerated head movements. Average placebo number of head movements was 294. Promethazine 25 mg increased head movements by 78% (P < .05), with a duration of 12 hours. Scopolamine 0.2 mg increased head movements by 91% (P < .05), with a duration of 4 hours. The effect of caffeine 250 mg and ephedrine 25 mg was not significant. When combined with scopolamine, ephedrine produced an 32% additive effect. Scopolamine 0.08 mg, 0.1 mg, and 0.2 mg and also promethazine 12.5 mg and 25 mg were significant (P < .05). Promethazine appears to be the drug of choice for intramuscular use because of a longer duration and a high level of effectiveness. Scopolamine was of high effectiveness, but had a duration of 4 hours. It was eight times as potent by the intramuscular as by the oral route.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1992.tb03803.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wood CD, 1990, Therapeutic effects of antimotion sickness drugs on secondary symptoms of motion sickness, Aviat Space Environ Med, 61, 151

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wood, C. D., Stewart, J. J., Wood, M. J., & Mims, M.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wood, Charles D.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-11
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
1008-1012
ISSN
  • 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2700
  • 1552-4604
OpenAlex
W1999411096
Cited by
32
References
11
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
motion sickness, intramuscular administration, promethazine, scopolamine, ephedrine, caffeine, duration of drug action, rotating chair, gastric motility, drug potency comparison
MeSH terms
Caffeine, Ephedrine, Female, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Male, Motion Sickness, Promethazine, Scopolamine, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.