The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards New Indicators of Disadvantage: Deprivation and Social Exclusion in Australia
Open accessAbstract
Concern over the reliability of conventional poverty studies has focused attention on the need to demonstrate that those identified as poor are actually experiencing hardship. This paper takes a step in this direction by examining poverty using a living standards approach derived from the literature on deprivation and social exclusion. Deprivation – defined as an enforced lack of socially perceived necessities – has emerged as a way of identifying who is missing out on what the community regards as the necessities (or essentials) of life. Social exclusion – which exists when individuals do not participate in key activities in society – has opened up new areas of inquiry relating to a lack of connectedness between individuals, the communities in which they live, and key economic and social processes. The findings indicate that many Australians face deprivation and exclusion in numerous aspects of their lives, and that those defined as poor in income terms are different from those who are deprived or excluded. The low overlap between the three indicators implies that they all have a role to play in documenting the extent of social disadvantage and helping to identify the factors that contribute to its various manifestations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sen, A. (2009) · Rugman Reviews · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-28787-8_94 · Cited by 15,837
Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
Babbie, E., & Dillman, D. A. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2068433 · Cited by 6,852
Usher, D., & Sen, A. (1987) · The Canadian Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/135247 · Cited by 3,731
Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living
Townsend, P. (1979) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520325760 · Cited by 3,160
Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion
Atkinson, T., Cantillon, B., Marlier, E., & Nolan, B. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0199253498.001.0001 · Cited by 1,133
Social exclusion : concept, application, and scrutiny
Sen, A. K. (2000) · Asian Development Bank eBooks · Cited by 1,115
The Multi-dimensional Analysis of Social Exclusion
Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Fahmy, E., Gordon, D., Lloyd, E., & Patsios, D. (2007) · UEL Research Repository (University of East London) · Cited by 671
Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s
(2005) · OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers · doi:10.1787/882106484586 · Cited by 542
MEASURING POVERTY AND DEPRIVATION IN SOUTH AFRICA
Klasen, S. (2000) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4991.2000.tb00390.x · Cited by 534
Social Exclusion in Britain 1991—1995
Burchardt, T., Grand, J. L., & Piachaud, D. (1999) · Social Policy and Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-9515.00148 · Cited by 527
Cited by
Hope, despair and transformation: Climate change and the promotion of mental health and wellbeing
Fritze, J. G., Blashki, G. A., Burke, S., & Wiseman, J. (2008) · International Journal of Mental Health Systems · doi:10.1186/1752-4458-2-13 · Cited by 602
Metadata
- Authors
- Saunders, P., Naidoo, Y., & Griffiths, M.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-194
- ISSN
- 0157-6321 (ISSN-L)
- 1839-4655
- OpenAlex
- W1581087445
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 83.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards New Indicators of Disadvantage: Deprivation and Social Exclusion in Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2008.tb00097.x
- The paper
- Saunders, P., Naidoo, Y., & Griffiths, M. (2008). Towards New Indicators of Disadvantage: Deprivation and Social Exclusion in Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2008.tb00097.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.