Cited by 52Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Environmental agents and erectile dysfunction: a study in a consulting population

Open access
OLIVA, ALEJANDRO, GIAMI, ALAIN, MULTIGNER, LUC·2002·Journal of Andrology

Abstract

We evaluated chemical and physical environmental agents as risk factors for erectile dysfunction among a consulting population. We studied 199 men who sought medical help for erectile disorders between 1996 and 1998 in 3 andrology units in the Litoral Sur region of Argentina. Patients were evaluated by monitoring nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity, and were classified as having normal (n = 26), irregular (dissociation, short episode or low amplitude, n = 146), or flat erectile pattern (n = 26). Exposure to environmental agents was assessed by a detailed interview, and 4 groups were constituted: nonexposed, pesticide‐exposed, solventexposed, and heat‐exposed. A multivariate polytomous logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for association between quality of nocturnal erections and exposure groups adjusted for confounding factors. Exposure to environmental agents was a risk factor for a flat erectile pattern (OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.5–33.0 for pesticides; OR 12.2, 95% CI 1.2–124.8 for solvents; and OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.3–9.4 for heat). Associations were much weaker for an irregular erectile pattern (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.5–6.7 for pesticides; OR 2.1, 95% CI 0.3–17.9 for solvents; and OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.4‐4.0 for heat). Our results suggest that environmental agents constitute a risk factor for erectile dysfunction by interfering with erectile ability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02277.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OLIVA, A., GIAMI, A., & MULTIGNER, L.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
MULTIGNER, LUC
Venue
Journal of Andrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-07-08
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
546-550
ISSN
  • 0196-3635 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-4640
OpenAlex
W1602510038
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Andrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, environmental exposure, pesticides, solvents, heat exposure, nocturnal penile tumescence, occupational exposure, risk factors
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Argentina, Environmental Exposure, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Penile Erection, Pesticides, Risk Factors, Solvents, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review