Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 953

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AN EXAMINATION OF REVERSE LOGISTICS PRACTICES

Rogers, Dale S., Tibben‐Lembke, Ronald·2001·Journal of Business Logistics

Abstract

Managing reverse logistics is becoming an important element of supply chain management and, in some cases, a profit generating function. In this paper, reverse logistics activities and key reverse logistics management methodologies are discussed, as well as their benefits and the barriers to successful implementation. Economic and supply chain issues related to reverse logistics are examined, and a working definition of reverse logistics is developed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00007.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 953

Metadata

Authors
Rogers, D. S., & Tibben‐Lembke, R.
Venue
Journal of Business Logistics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-09
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
129-148
ISSN
  • 0735-3766 (ISSN-L)
  • 2158-1592
OpenAlex
W2142174251
Cited by
953
References
2
FWCI
15.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AN EXAMINATION OF REVERSE LOGISTICS PRACTICES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00007.x
The paper
Rogers, D. S., & Tibben‐Lembke, R. (2001). AN EXAMINATION OF REVERSE LOGISTICS PRACTICES. Journal of Business Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00007.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.