The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SUPPLY CHAIN PROCESS INTEGRATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Abstract
The current study was undertaken to further understanding of supply chain process integration. It is suggested that supply chain integration, the practice of realigning firms' operating structures, should be understood from an internal‐external perspective and a process view. Drawing upon four theories—Strategy‐Structure‐Performance framework, the resource based view of the firm, transaction cost economics, and social network analysis—and combining industry inputs, a theoretical framework of supply chain process integration is developed. It is argued that a firm's strategic priorities are key factors of supply chain process integration. Superior performance is likely to be achieved when necessary supply chain capabilities are developed through supply chain process integration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
A resource‐based view of the firm
Wernerfelt, B. (1984) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207 · Cited by 25,635
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Porter, M. E. (1985) · Cited by 14,701
The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation
Grant, R. M. (1991) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166664 · Cited by 9,699
Williamson, O. E. (1975) · Free Press eBooks · Cited by 9,210
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425
The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400403 · Cited by 7,947
Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition
Lazega, E., & Burt, R. S. (1995) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.2307/3322456 · Cited by 7,853
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111
Cited by
Exploiting the potential of manufacturing network embeddedness: An OM perspective
Golini, R., Deflorin, P., & Scherrer, M. (2016) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-11-2014-0559 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, H., Daugherty, P. J., & Landry, T. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Logistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 27-46
- ISSN
- 0735-3766 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-1592
- OpenAlex
- W2000565124
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 21.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SUPPLY CHAIN PROCESS INTEGRATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00110.x
- The paper
- Chen, H., Daugherty, P. J., & Landry, T. D. (2009). SUPPLY CHAIN PROCESS INTEGRATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK. Journal of Business Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00110.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
