The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The African American Student Network: Creating Sanctuaries and Counterspaces for Coping With Racial Microaggressions in Higher Education Settings
Abstract
African American college students face a number of race‐related stressors on predominantly White campuses. The African American Student Network is described as a potential humanistic counterspace to provide a sanctuary for these students when coping with racial microaggressions. The development and study of future humanistic interventions in this area is recommended.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AFAM is a sanctuary for coping with racial microaggressions.
“We captured the phenomenon of racialized labor in everyday life by listening to students' discussions in AFAM-a sanctuary for coping with racial microaggressionsfor over a decade (Grier-Reed, 2010).”
From The Emergence of Racialized Labor and Racial Battle Fatigue in the African American Student Network (AFAM) (2020) · cites this paper as Grier-Reed, 2010
AFAM is based in a humanistic counseling orientation.
“Developed to help Black students find community and make meaning of their experiences on campus, AFAM is based in a humanistic counseling orientation (Grier-Reed, 2010; Grier-Reed & Ajayi, 2019).”
From The Emergence of Racialized Labor and Racial Battle Fatigue in the African American Student Network (AFAM) (2020) · cites this paper as Grier-Reed, 2010
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 140
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb02576.x · DOI · Paper page
- Astin A. W., 2005, Degree attainment rates at American colleges and universities
- 10.2307/2649125 · DOI
- Chiang L., 2004, Coping attitudes, sources, and practices among Black and Latino college students, Adolescence, 39, 793
- 10.2307/2295400 · DOI
- 10.1353/jhe.2004.0018 · DOI
- Myers R. D., 2003, College success programs
- 10.1080/00220670309598805 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.2161-1939.2008.tb00043.x · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02439.x · DOI
- Sedlacek W. E., 1983, New directions for teaching and learning, 39
- Solorzano D., 2000, Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African‐American college students, The Journal of Negro Education, 69, 60
- 10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0095798402239228 · DOI
- Thompson M. S., 2006, Understanding differences in postsecondary educational attainment: A comparison of predictive measures for Black and White students, The Journal of Negro Education, 75, 546
- 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb02562.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02506966 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- GRIER‐REED, T. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- GRIER‐REED, TABITHA L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 181-188
- ISSN
- 1931-0293 (ISSN-L)
- 2164-490X
- OpenAlex
- W2031784591
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Humanistic Counseling Education and Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- African American college students, racial microaggressions, counter-spaces, sanctuaries, coping, student support networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
