The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently
Abstract
This paper offers and tests an approach to conceptualizing the global competency of engineers. It begins by showing that the often-stated goal of working effectively with different cultures is fundamentally about learning to work effectively with people who define problems differently. The paper offers a minimum learning criterion for global competency and three learning outcomes whose achievement can help engineering students fulfill that criterion. It uses the criterion to establish a typology of established methods to support global learning for engineering students. It introduces the course, Engineering Cultures, as an example of an integrated classroom experience designed to enable larger numbers of engineering students to take the critical first step toward global competency, and it offers a test application of the learning criterion and outcomes by using them to organize summative assessments of student learning in the course.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Education for the Intercultural Experience
Paige (1994) · Cited by 1,231
The ABET “Professional Skills” - Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?
Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & McGourty, J. (2005) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x · Cited by 1,166
Knowledge and professional identity in engineering: code‐switching and the metrics of progress
Downey, G. L., & Lucena, J. C. (2004) · History and Technology · doi:10.1080/0734151042000304358 · Cited by 174
Self-citationAre Engineers Losing Control of Technology?
Downey, G. (2005) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1205/cherd.05095 · Cited by 129
Self-citationThe Changing Face of Chemical Engineering Research
Bertrand, J., & Mavros, P. P. (2005) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1205/cherd.04131 · Cited by 45
How one institution provides a global perspective for engineers
Mello, N. A. (2002) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2001.963990 · Cited by 12
Cited by
Analysis of macroethics teaching practices and perceptions in engineering: A cultural comparison
Polmear, M., Bielefeldt, A. R., Knight, D., Canney, N., & Swan, C. (2019) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2019.1593323 · Cited by 57
(2015) · Philosophy of Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3 · Cited by 36
Robots for Social Justice (R4SJ): Toward a More Equitable Practice of Human-Robot Interaction
Zhu, Y., Wen, R., & Williams, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610977.3634944 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Downey, G. L., Lucena, J. C., Moskal, B. M., Parkhurst, R., Bigley, T., Hays, C., Jesiek, B. K., Kelly, L., Miller, J., Ruff, S., Lehr, J. L., & Nichols-Belo, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-122
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007554550
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 28.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00883.x
- The paper
- Downey, G. L., Lucena, J. C., Moskal, B. M., Parkhurst, R., Bigley, T., Hays, C., Jesiek, B. K., Kelly, L., Miller, J., Ruff, S., Lehr, J. L., & Nichols-Belo, A. (2006). The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00883.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.