Cited by 57Education, Achievement, and GiftednessHigher Education Research StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST TAKERS

Open access
Clark, Mary Jo, Grandy, Jerilee·1984·ETS Research Report Series

Abstract

ABSTRACT The number of women college students has increased dramatically over the past fifteen years; in this same time period, the average College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores for women have declined more than the scores for men. This study summarizes recent evidence concerning the academic performance of women and men by examining sex differences among (1) all SAT takers, (2) test takers grouped by anticipated major field of study, and (3) college freshman year courses and grades. Three major research questions guided this study: Are there consistent differences in the intellectual abilities of men and women? Do precollege admissions variables predict college performance with equal accuracy for women and men? Have the contents or structure of the SAT contributed to observed sex differences in performance on the test? Though the men and women who take the SAT differ in high school courses and grade point average, major field and career interests, and socioeconomic backgrounds, neither these differences nor research evidence on differential cognitive functioning were found sufficient to account for all of the observed sex differences in performance on the SAT. Some but not all of the male‐female differences in scores on the mathematics portion of the SAT were accounted for by differences in the depth and recency of course preparation. The observed‐first‐year college grades of women were slightly underpredicted by test scores and high school grades, but the magnitude of the underprediction was very small. While specific changes in the contents or structure of the SAT could not be associated with score changes, it seems likely that numerous small adjustments have played some part in recent shifts among the average test scores of women and men. Consistent with recent literature on sex differences in cognitive performance, this study concludes that sex‐related SAT differences are very small relative to the generally similar levels of performance by men and women, and that using both test scores and high school records to predict first‐year college grades continues to work reasonably well for both sexes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2330-8516.1984.tb00083.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women outperform men in collegiate academic performance in most subjects and even in online college courses.

    “Women outperform men in collegiate academic performance in most subjects35–38 and even in online college courses.39”

    From Sleep quality, duration, and consistency are associated with better academic performance in college students (2019) · cites this paper as [35]

    The section on college grades reports higher earned college grade averages for women than men in the groups studied. It does not establish the more specific claim that women outperform men in most subjects. The online-course clause has a separate citation (39) and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Linn, R. L. 1973. Fair Test Use in Selection. Review if Educational Research 43: 139-161.
  2. Lord, F. M. 1977. Practical Applications if Item Characteristic Curve Theory (Research Bulletin 77-3).
  3. Maccoby, E. E. and Jacklin, C. M. 1974. The Psychology if Sex Differences. Standford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
  4. Pallas, A. M. and Alexander, K. L. 1983. Sex Differences in Quantitative SAT Performance: New Evidence on the Differential Coursework Hypotheses. American Educational Research Journal 20: 165-182.
  5. Welch, W. W., Anderson, R. E., and Harris, L. J. 1982. The Effects of Schooling on Mathematics Achievement. Amer- ican Educational Research Journal 19: 145-153.
  6. Wild, C. L. 1977. Statistical Issues Raised by Title IX Requirements on Admission Procedures. Journal ifNational Association if Women Deans, Administrators, and Coun- selors 40: 53-56.
  7. Wild, C. L. and Dwyer, C. A. 1977. Sex Bias in Selection Procedures and Selection Instruments. Presented at the Third International Symposium on Educational Testing, Leyden, The Netherlands.
  8. Wittig, M. A. and Petersen, A. C., eds. 1979. Sex-Related Differences in Cognitive Functioning. New York: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, M. J., & Grandy, J.
Affiliations
College Board (US)
Venue
ETS Research Report Series
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-12
Volume
1984
Issue
2
ISSN
2330-8516 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108105212
Cited by
57
References
1
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ETS Research Report Series (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
sex differences, SAT scores, academic performance, female university students, university admission, mathematics achievement, career interest, major field of study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review