Cited by 173Probability and Risk ModelsInsurance and Financial Risk ManagementTraffic and Road Safety

Automobile insurance ratemaking in the presence of asymmetrical information

Dionne, G., Vanasse, C.·1992·Journal of Applied Econometrics

Abstract

Automobile insurance is an example of a market where multi‐period contracts are observed. This form of contract can be justified by asymmetrical information between the insurer and the insured. Insurers use risk classification together with bonus‐malus systems. In this paper we show that the actual methodology for the integration of these two approaches can lead to inconsistencies. We develop a statistical model that adequately integrates risk classification and experience rating. For this purpose we present Poisson and negative binomial models with regression component in order to use all available information in the estimation of accident distribution. A bonus‐malus system which integrates a priori and a posteriori information on an individual basis is proposed, and insurance premium tables are derived as a function of time, past accidents and the significant variables in the regression. Statistical results were obtained from a sample of 19,013 drivers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jae.3950070204

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dionne, G., & Vanasse, C.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
Journal of Applied Econometrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-04
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
149-165
ISSN
  • 0883-7252 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1255
OpenAlex
W2083006580
Cited by
173
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Econometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Probability and Risk Models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Insurance and Financial Risk Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
Keywords
automobile insurance, ratemaking, information asymmetry, risk classification, bonus-malus system, experience rating, Poisson regression, negative binomial regression, accident distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review