Antibacterial properties of nitric oxide–releasing sol‐gels
Abstract
The antibacterial characteristics of nitric oxide (NO)‐releasing sol‐gel coatings are described. The NO release from these surfaces is steady over short periods (≈1 h) and measurable over several days. The ability of NO to prevent bacterial adhesion is evaluated by exposing controls and NO‐releasing sol‐gels to ≈10 8 colony‐forming units (cfu)/mL saline suspensions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion to sol‐gel controls varies depending on the sol‐gel formulation. Sol‐gel surfaces capable of NO release decrease bacterial adhesion by 30% to 95% relative to controls. The contact angle measurements of control and NO‐releasing surfaces are similar, supporting NO's action as an antibacterial agent against bacterial adhesion. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 67A: 1276–1283, 2003
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NO reduced bacterial cell coverage on these surfaces by up to 40%.
“NO successfully reduced bacterial cell coverage on these surfaces by up to 40 %.”
From Recent advances in thromboresistant and antimicrobial polymers for biomedical applications: just say yes to nitric oxide (NO) (2016) · cites this paper as [289]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 78
- Authors
- Nablo, B. J., & Schoenfisch, M. H.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schoenfisch, Mark H.
- ORCID
- Schoenfisch, Mark H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11-07
- Volume
- 67A
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1276-1283
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2054614691
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
- Keywords
- nitric oxide, sol-gel coatings, antibacterial surfaces, bacterial adhesion, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, nitric oxide release, contact angle, wettability
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Azo Compounds, Bacterial Adhesion, Cell Survival, Gels, Nitric Oxide, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Surface Properties, Water, Molecular Structure, Silicon Compounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review