The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of biocompatibility of polypyrrole in vitro and in vivo
Abstract
In this study, the biocompatibility of the electrically conductive polymer polypyrrole (PPy) with nerve tissue was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. The extraction solution of PPy powder, which was synthesized chemically, was tested for acute toxicity, subacute toxicity, pyretogen, quantitative measure of cell viability, hemolysis, allergen, and micronuclei. The PPy membrane was synthesized electrochemically on the indium tin oxide conductive borosilicate glass. The dorsal root ganglia from 1–3‐day‐old Sprague‐Dawley rats were cultured above PPy membrane and observed by light or scanning electron microscopy. The PPy‐silicone tube (PPy membrane on the inner surface of the silicone tube) also synthesized electrochemically was used to bridge across 10‐mm sciatic nerve gap in rats. Twenty‐four weeks after the operation to rats, the regenerated tissues were observed by electrophysiological and histological techniques. PPy extraction solution showed no evidence of acute and subacute toxicity, pyretogen, hemolysis, allergen, and mutagenesis, and the Schwann cells from the PPy extraction solution group showed better survival rate and proliferation rate as compared with the saline solution control group. The migration of the Schwann cells and the neurite extension from dorsal root ganglia on the surface of PPy membrane‐coated glass was better than those of bare glass. There was only lightly inflammation during 6 months of the postoperation, when the PPy‐silicone tube bridged across the gap of the transected sciatic nerve. The regeneration of nerve tissue in the PPy‐silicone tube was slightly better than that in the plain silicone tube by means of electrophysiological and histological examination. The results of this study indicate that PPy has a good biocompatibility with rat peripheral nerve tissue and that PPy might be a candidate material for bridging the peripheral nerve gap. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 68A: 411–422, 2004
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering
Guimard, N. K., Gomez, N., & Schmidt, C. E. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.012 · Cited by 1,599
Electrically conductive polymers and composites for biomedical applications
Kaur, G., Adhikari, R., Cass, P., Bown, M., & Gunatillake, P. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra01851j · Cited by 836
Polypyrrole-coated electrospun PLGA nanofibers for neural tissue applications
Lee, J. Y., Bashur, C. A., Goldstein, A. S., & Schmidt, C. E. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.042 · Cited by 735
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., Baharvand, H., Kiani, S., Al-Deyab, S. S., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.383 · Cited by 698
Conducting polymers for neural interfaces: Challenges in developing an effective long-term implant
Green, R. A., Lovell, N. H., Wallace, G. G., & Poole-Warren, L. A. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.047 · Cited by 691
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Gu, X., Yuan, C., Chen, S., Zhang, P., Zhang, T., Yao, J., Chen, F., & Chen, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12-17
- Volume
- 68A
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-422
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W1552981362
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of biocompatibility of polypyrrole in vitro and in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.20065
- The paper
- Wang, X., Gu, X., Yuan, C., Chen, S., Zhang, P., Zhang, T., Yao, J., Chen, F., & Chen, G. (2004). Evaluation of biocompatibility of polypyrrole in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.20065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.