The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2
Abstract
Many engineers and surgeons trace implant failure to poor osseointegration (or the bonding of an orthopedic implant to juxtaposed bone) and/or bacteria infection. By using novel nanotopographies, researchers have shown that nanostructured ceramics, carbon fibers, polymers, metals, and composites enhance osteoblast adhesion and calcium/phosphate mineral deposition. However, the function of bacteria on materials with nanostructured surfaces remains largely uninvestigated. This is despite the fact that during normal surgical insertion of an orthopedic implant, bacteria from the patient's own skin and/or mucosa enters the wound site. These bacteria (namely, Staphylococcus epidermidis) irreversibly adhere to an implant surface while various physiological stresses induce alterations in the bacterial growth rate leading to biofilm formation. Because of their integral role in determining the success of orthopedic implants, the objective of this in vitro study was to examine the functions of (i) S. epidermidis and (ii) osteoblasts (or bone‐forming cells) on ZnO and titania (TiO 2), which possess nanostructured compared to microstructured surface features. ZnO is a well‐known antimicrobial agent and TiO 2 readily forms on titanium once implanted. Results of this study provided the first evidence of decreased S. epidermidis adhesion on ZnO and TiO 2 with nanostructured when compared with microstructured surface features. Moreover, compared with microphase formulations, results of this study showed increased osteoblast adhesion, alkaline phosphatase activity, and calcium mineral deposition on nanophase ZnO and TiO 2. In this manner, this study suggests that nanophase ZnO and TiO 2 may reduce S. epidermidis adhesion and increase osteoblast functions necessary to promote the efficacy of orthopedic implants. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2006
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
A component of innate immunity prevents bacterial biofilm development
Singh, P. K., Parsek, M. R., Greenberg, E. P., & Welsh, M. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417552a · Cited by 1,026
Sadovskaya, I., Vinogradov, E., Flahaut, S., Kogan, G., & Jabbouri, S. (2005) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.73.5.3007-3017.2005 · Cited by 188
Cited by
A mini review on plant-mediated zinc oxide nanoparticles and their antibacterial potency
Kavitha, A., Doss, A., Praveen Pole, R. P., Pushpa Rani, T. P. K., Prasad, R., & Satheesh, S. (2023) · Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102654 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Colon, G., Ward, B. C., & Webster, T. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-02
- Volume
- 78A
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 595-604
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2049242480
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.30789
- The paper
- Colon, G., Ward, B. C., & Webster, T. J. (2006). Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30789
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.