The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biodegradation of high‐toughness double network hydrogels as potential materials for artificial cartilage
Abstract
This study evaluated biodegradation properties of four novel high‐toughness double network (DN) hydrogels as potential materials for artificial cartilage. Concerning each DN gel material, a total of 12 specimens were prepared, and 6 of the 12 specimens were examined to determine the mechanical properties without any treatments. The remaining 6 specimens were implanted into the subcutaneous tissue, using 6 mature female rabbits. At 6 weeks after implantation, the mechanical properties and the water content of the implanted specimens were measured. In the poly(2‐acrylamide‐2‐methyl‐propane sulfonic acid)/poly(N,N′‐dimethyl acrylamide) DN gel, the ultimate stress and the tangent modulus were significantly increased from 3.10 and 0.20 MPa, respectively, to 5.40 and 0.37 MPa, respectively, with a significant reduction of the water content after implantation (94 to 91%). In the poly(2‐acrylamide‐2‐methyl‐propane sulfonic acid)/polyacrylamide DN gel and the cellulose/poly(dimethyl acrylamide) DN gel, the stress (11.4 and 1.90 MPa, respectively) and the modulus (0.30 and 1.70 MPa, respectively) or the water content rarely changed after implantation (90 and 85%, respectively). In the bacterial cellulose/gelatin DN gel, the ultimate stress was dramatically reduced from 4.30 to 1.98 MPa with a significant increase of the water content after implantation (78 to 86%). This study implied that these DN gels except for the cellulose/gelatin DN gel are potential materials that may meet the requirements of artificial cartilage. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2007
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication
Malda, J., Visser, J., Melchels, F. P., Jüngst, T., Hennink, W. E., Dhert, W. J. A., Groll, J., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302042 · Cited by 1,901
Multi-scale multi-mechanism design of tough hydrogels: building dissipation into stretchy networks
Zhao, X. (2014) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/c3sm52272e · Cited by 1,252
Fundamentals of double network hydrogels
Chen, Q., Chen, H., Zhu, L., & Zheng, J. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/c5tb00123d · Cited by 657
Biomaterials for articular cartilage tissue engineering: Learning from biology
Armiento, A. R., Stoddart, M. J., Alini, M., & Eglin, D. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.021 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Azuma, C., Yasuda, K., Tanabe, Y., Taniguro, H., Kanaya, F., Nakayama, A., Chen, Y. M., Gong, J. P., & Osada, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-21
- Volume
- 81A
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 373-380
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2027047046
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodegradation of high‐toughness double network hydrogels as potential materials for artificial cartilage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.31043
- The paper
- Azuma, C., Yasuda, K., Tanabe, Y., Taniguro, H., Kanaya, F., Nakayama, A., Chen, Y. M., Gong, J. P., & Osada, Y. (2007). Biodegradation of high‐toughness double network hydrogels as potential materials for artificial cartilage. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.