The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural and mechanical evaluations of a topology optimized titanium interbody fusion cage fabricated by selective laser melting process
Abstract
A topology optimized lumbar interbody fusion cage was made of Ti‐Al6‐V4 alloy by the rapid prototyping process of selective laser melting (SLM) to reproduce designed microstructure features. Radiographic characterizations and the mechanical properties were investigated to determine how the structural characteristics of the fabricated cage were reproduced from design characteristics using micro‐computed tomography scanning. The mechanical modulus of the designed cage was also measured to compare with tantalum, a widely used porous metal. The designed microstructures can be clearly seen in the micrographs of the micro‐CT and scanning electron microscopy examinations, showing the SLM process can reproduce intricate microscopic features from the original designs. No imaging artifacts from micro‐CT were found. The average compressive modulus of the tested caged was 2.97 ± 0.90 GPa, which is comparable with the reported porous tantalum modulus of 3 GPa and falls between that of cortical bone (15 GPa) and trabecular bone (0.1–0.5 GPa). The new porous Ti‐6Al‐4V optimal‐structure cage fabricated by SLM process gave consistent mechanical properties without artifactual distortion in the imaging modalities and thus it can be a promising alternative as a porous implant for spine fusion. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2007
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In vitro and in vivo degradation of bioabsorbable PLLA spinal fusion cages
van Dijk, M., Tunc, D. C., Smit, T. H., Higham, P., Burger, E. H., & Wuisman, P. I. J. M. (2002) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.10466 · Cited by 78
Cited by
Review of selective laser melting: Materials and applications
Yap, C. Y., Chua, C. K., Dong, Z. L., Liu, Z. H., Zhang, D. Q., Loh, L. E., & Sing, S. L. (2015) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.4935926 · Cited by 2,353
Wang, X., Xu, S., Zhou, S., Xu, W., Leary, M., Choong, P., Qian, M., Brandt, M., & Xie, Y. M. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 · Cited by 2,121
Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing
Liu, J., Gaynor, A. T., Chen, S., Kang, Z., Suresh, K., Takezawa, A., Li, L., Kato, J., Tang, J., Wang, C. C. L., et al. (2018) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-018-1994-3 · Cited by 870
Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM)
Parthasarathy, J., Starly, B., Raman, S., & Christensen, A. (2010) · Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.10.006 · Cited by 816
Zhang, L., & Attar, H. (2016) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.201500419 · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, C., Wirtz, T., LaMarca, F., & Hollister, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-05
- Volume
- 83A
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 272-279
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2142409197
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural and mechanical evaluations of a topology optimized titanium interbody fusion cage fabricated by selective laser melting process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.31231
- The paper
- Lin, C., Wirtz, T., LaMarca, F., & Hollister, S. J. (2007). Structural and mechanical evaluations of a topology optimized titanium interbody fusion cage fabricated by selective laser melting process. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31231
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.