Cited by 77Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineWound Healing and Treatments

Temporal progression of the host response to implanted poly(ethylene glycol)‐based hydrogels

Open access
Lynn, Aaron D., Blakney, Anna K., Kyriakides, Themis R., Bryant, Stephanie J.·2011·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels hold great promise as in vivo cell carriers for tissue engineering. To ensure appropriate performance of these materials when implanted, the host response must be well understood. The objectives for this study were to characterize the temporal evolution of the foreign body reaction (FBR) to acellular PEG‐based hydrogels prepared from PEG diacrylate precursors when implanted subcutaneously in immunocompentent c57bl/6 mice by (immuno)histochemical analysis and gene expression. Compared with a normal FBR elicited by silicone (SIL), PEG hydrogels without or with a cell adhesion ligand RGD elicited a strong early inflammatory response evidenced by a thick band of macrophages as early as day 2, persisting through two weeks, and by increased interleukin‐1β expression. PEG‐only hydrogels showed a slower, but more sustained progression of inflammation over PEG‐RGD. Temporal changes in gene expression were observed in response to PEG‐based materials and in general exhibited, elevated expression of inflammatory and wound healing genes in the tissues surrounding the implants, while the expression patterns were more stable in response to SIL. While a stabilized FBR was achieved with SIL and to a lesser degree with PEG‐RGD, the PEG‐only hydrogels had not yet stabilized after 4 weeks. In summary, PEG‐only hydrogels elicit a strong early inflammatory reaction, which persists throughout the course of the implantation even as a collagenous capsule begins to form. However, the incorporation of RGD tethers partially attenuates this response within 2 weeks leading to an improved FBR to PEG‐based hydrogels. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 2011.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.33015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 77

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Nho YC Moon SW Lee KH Park CW Suh TS Jung YA Ahn WS Chun HJ Evaluations of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels cross-linked under gamma-ray irradiation Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 2005 11 1 159 164

Authors
Lynn, A. D., Blakney, A. K., Kyriakides, T. R., & Bryant, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Bryant, Stephanie J.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-25
Volume
96A
Issue
4
Pages
621-631
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W1969165091
Cited by
77
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01gm072194-11)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM072194)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (1R03DE0195051, R03DE019505)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels, foreign body reaction, host response to implants, RGD peptide, inflammation, macrophages, IL-1β, gene expression, collagen capsule, tissue engineering scaffolds, wound healing genes
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Foreign-Body Reaction, Macrophages, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Polyethylene Glycols, Implants, Experimental, Hydrogels, Tissue Engineering, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review