Cited by 150Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsTitanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties

Osteogenic activity and antibacterial effect of porous titanium modified with metal-organic framework films

Chen, Junyu, Zhang, Xin, Huang, Chao, Cai, He, Hu, Shanshan, Wan, Qianbing, Pei, Xibo, Wang, Jian·2017·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

As a new class of crystalline nanoporous materials, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have recently been used for biomedical applications due to their large surface area, high porosity, and theoretically infinite structures. To improve the biological performance of titanium, MOF films were applied to surface modification of titanium. Zn-based MOF films composed of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) crystals with nanoscale and microscale sizes (nanoZIF-8 and microZIF-8) were prepared on porous titanium surfaces by hydrothermal and solvothermal methods, respectively. The ZIF-8 films were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The nanoZIF-8 film exhibited good biocompatibility, whereas the microZIF-8 film showed obvious cytotoxicity to MG63 cells. Compared to pure titanium and alkali- and heat-treated porous titanium, the nanoZIF-8 film not only enhanced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, extracellular matrix mineralization, and expression of osteogenic genes (ALP, Runx2) in MG63 cells but also inhibited the growth of Streptococcus mutans. These results indicate that MOF films or coatings may be promising candidates for bone tissue engineering. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 834-846, 2017.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.35960

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 150

Authors
Chen, J., Zhang, X., Huang, C., Cai, H., Hu, S., Wan, Q., Pei, X., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Chao
  • Pei, Xibo
  • Wang, Jian
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-25
Volume
105
Issue
3
Pages
834-846
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W2550538514
Cited by
150
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21501123)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
Keywords
metal-organic frameworks, ZIF-8, porous titanium, surface modification, osteogenic activity, antibacterial activity, Streptococcus mutans, alkaline phosphatase, Runx2, bone tissue engineering, biocompatibility, cytotoxicity, hydrothermal synthesis, solvothermal synthesis, extracellular matrix mineralization, dental implants
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Imidazoles, Materials Testing, Osteogenesis, Streptococcus mutans, Titanium, Porosity, Zeolites, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review