Cited by 261Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsNanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

Fabrication and characterization of chitosan‐gelatin blend nanofibers for skin tissue engineering

Dhandayuthapani, Brahatheeswaran, Krishnan, Uma Maheswari, Sethuraman, Swaminathan·2010·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials

Abstract

Tissue engineering scaffolds produced by electrospinning feature a structural similarity to the natural extracellular matrix. Polymer blending is one of the effective methods to provide new and desirable biocomposites for tissue engineering applications. In this study chitosan was blended with gelatin and the effect of processing parameters of electrospinning and the solution properties of the polymer on the morphology of the fibers obtained were investigated. The morphology of the electrospun chitosan, gelatin and the chitosan‐gelatin blend were characterized using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The miscibility of the blend was determined using a SEM, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) Fourier transform Infrared spectrometer (FTIR). Further the tensile properties of the blend nanofibers were studied and compared with chitosan and gelatin fibers. In this study we have been able to electrospin defect‐free chitosan, gelatin and chitosan‐gelatin blend nanofibers with smooth morphology and diameter ranging from 120 to 200 nm, 100 to 150 nm, and 120–220 nm, respectively by optimizing the process and solution parameters. Chitosan and gelatin formed completely miscible blends as evidenced from DSC and FTIR measurements. The tensile strength of the chitosan‐gelatin blend nanofibers (37.91 ± 4.42 MPa) was significantly higher than the gelatin nanofibers (7.23 ± 1.15 MPa) (p < 0.05) and comparable with that of normal human skin. Thus the novel chitosan‐gelatin blend nanofiber system has potential application in skin regeneration. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.b.31651

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhandayuthapani, B., Krishnan, U. M., & Sethuraman, S.
Affiliations
SASTRA University (IN)
Corresponding author
Sethuraman, Swaminathan
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-12
Volume
94B
Issue
1
Pages
264-272
ISSN
  • 1552-4973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4981
OpenAlex
W2111040259
Cited by
261
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Keywords
chitosan, gelatin, polymer blend nanofibers, electrospinning, skin tissue engineering, skin regeneration, tensile strength, blend miscibility, fiber morphology, extracellular matrix mimicry, biocomposites
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Calorimetry, Differential Scanning, Gelatin, Humans, Skin, Surface Properties, Tensile Strength, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Tissue Engineering, Chitosan, Tissue Scaffolds, Electrochemical Techniques, Nanofibers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review