Cited by 38Laser Material Processing TechniquesPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Surface patterning of a novel PEG‐functionalized poly‐l‐lactide polymer to improve its biocompatibility: Applications to bioresorbable vascular stents

Open access
Pacharra, Sandra, Ortiz, Rocio, McMahon, Sean, Wang, Wenxin, Viebahn, Richard, Salber, Jochen, Quintana, Iban·2019·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials

Abstract

Today, research in the field of bioresorbable vascular stents (BVS) not only focusses on a new material being nontoxic but also tries to enhance its biocompatibility in terms of endothelialization potential and hemocompatibility. To this end, we used picosecond laser ablation technology as a single‐step and contactless method for surface microstructuring of a bioresorbable polymer which can be utilized in stent manufacture. The method works on all materials via fast material removal, can be easily adapted for micropatterning of tubular or more complex sample shapes and scaled up by means of micropatterning of metal molds for manufacturing. Here, picosecond laser ablation was applied to a bioresorbable, biologically inactive and polyethylene glycol‐modified poly‐L‐lactide polymer (PEGylated PLLA) to generate parallel microgrooves with varying geometries. The different patterns were thoroughly evaluated by a series of cyto‐ and hemocompatibility tests revealing that all surfaces were non‐toxic and non‐hemolytic. More importantly, patterns with 20 to 25 µm wide and 6 to 7 µm deep grooves significantly enhanced endothelial cell adhesion in comparison to samples with smaller grooves. Here, human cardiac microvascular endothelial cells were found to align along the groove direction, which is thought to encourage endothelialization of intraluminal surfaces of BVS. © 2018 The Authors Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 00B: 000–000, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 624–634, 2019.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.b.34155

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PEG functionalised PLLA with low PEG content (0.1-1.5 wt%) shows increased water absorption and degradation rate due to the presence of PEG.

    “Despite the low PEG content, similar results are seen, with increased water absorption and degradation rate resulting from the presence (but not length) of PEG”

    From Tuning structural relaxations, mechanical properties, and degradation timescale of PLLA during hydrolytic degradation by blending with PLCL-PEG (2019) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says PEG improves PLLA’s hydrophilicity and that incorporating PEG tunes its degradation rate. It does not report increased water absorption, establish that degradation is faster, give a PEG content of 0.1–1.5 wt%, or compare PEG lengths. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. [1]Li AY, Law KB, Phillips KRB, Nwachukwu H, Butany J, Gotlieb AI. Pathology of cardiovascular interventions and surgery. Diagn Histopathol 2010; 16(1): 17– 30.
  2. [2]Garg S, Serruys PW. Coronary stent: Current status. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56(10): S1– S42. 20797502
  3. [3]Kipshidze N, Dangas G, Tsapenko M, Moses J, Leon MB, Kutryk M, Serruys P. Role of the endothelium in modulating neointimal formation: Vasculoprotective approaches to attenuate restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44(4): 733– 739. 15312851
  4. [4]Liu T, Liu S, Zhang K, Chen J, Huang N. Endothelialization of implanted cardiovascular biomaterial surfaces: The development from in vitro to in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 2014; 102(10): 3754– 3772. 24243819
  5. [5]de Mel A, Jell G, Stevens MM, Seifalian AM. Biofunctionalization of biomaterials for accelerated in situ endothelialisation: A review. Biomacromolcules 2008; 9(11): 2969– 2979. 18831592
  6. [6]Bettinger CJ, Langer R, Borenstein T. Engineering substrate topography at the micro‐ and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew Chem Int Ed 2009; 48: 5406– 5415. PMC2834566 19492373
  7. [7]Ross AM, Jiang Z, Bastmeyer M, Lahann J. Physical aspects of cell culture substrates: Topography, roughness, and elasticity. Small 2012; 8(3): 336– 355. 22162324
  8. [8]Nikkhah M, Edalat F, Manoucheri S, Khademhosseini A. Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell‐substrate interface. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 5230– 5246. 22521491 PMC3619386
  9. [9]Lu J, Rao MP, MacDonald NC, Khang D, Webster TJ. Improved endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation on patterned titanium surfaces with rationally designed micrometer to nanometer features. Acta Biomater 2008; 4(1): 192– 201. 17851147
  10. [10]Biela SA, Su Y, Spatz JP, Kemkemer R. Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts to topography in the nano‐micro range. Acta Biomater 2009; 5(7): 2460– 2466. 19410529
  11. [11]Ranjan A, Webster TJ. Increased endothelial cell adhesion and elongation on micro‐patterned nano‐rough poly(dimethylsiloxane) films. Nanotechnology 2009; 20(39): 305102. 19581692
  12. [12]Liliensiek SJ, Wood JA, Yong J, Auerbach R, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Modulation of human vascular endothelial cell behaviors by nanotopographic cues. Biomaterials 2010; 31(20): 5418– 5426. 20400175 PMC2907086
  13. [13]Zheng N, Yang P, Wang QY, Yang ZH, Huang N. Preparation of micro‐patterned surfaces of Si‐N‐O films and their influence on adhesion behavior of endothelial cells. Sci China Tech Sci 2010; 53(1): 257– 263.
  14. [14]Franco D, Klingauf M, Bednarzik M, Cecchini M, Kurtcuoglu V, Gobrecht J, Poulikakos D, Ferrari A. Control of initial endothelial spreading by topographic activation of focal adhesion kinase. Soft Matter 2011; 7: 7313– 7324.
  15. [15]Dickinson LE, Rand DR, Tsao J, Eberle W, Gerecht S. Endothelial cell responses to micropillar substrates if varying dimensions and stiffness. J Biomed Mater Res 2012; 100A(6): 1457– 1466. PMC3324647 22389314
  16. [16]Aktas C, Dörrschuck E, Schuh C, Miró MM, Lee J, Pütz N, Wennemuth G, Metzger W, Oberringer M, Veith M, Abdul‐Khaliq H. Micro‐ and nanostructured Al2O3 surfaces for controlled vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell adhesion and proliferation. Mater Sci Eng C 2012; 32: 1017– 1024.
  17. [17]Franco D, Milde F, Klingauf M, Orsenigo F, Dejana E, Poulikakos D, Cecchini M, Koumoutsakos P, Ferrari A, Kurtcuoglu V. Accelerated endothelial wound healing on microstructured substrates under flow. Biomaterials 2013; 34: 1488– 1497. 23182348
  18. [18]Ding Y, Yang Z, Bi CWC, Yang M, Xu SL, Lu X, Huang N, Huang P, Leng Y. Directing vascular cell selectivity and hemocompatibility on patterned platforms featuring variable topographic geometry and size. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2014; 6: 12062– 12070. 25039647
  19. [19]Anderson D, Hinds M. Endothelial cell micropatterning: Methods, effects, and applications. Ann Biomed Eng 2011; 39(9): 2329– 2345. 21761242 PMC3359702
  20. [20]Chong DST, Lindsey B, Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Seifalian AM, Hamilton G. Luminal surface engineering, micro and nanopatterning: Potential for self endothelialising vascular grafts? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47(5): 566– 576. 24642295
  21. [21]Sprague EA, Tio F, Ahmed SH, Granada JF, Bailey. Impact of parallel micro‐engineered stent grooves on endothelial cell migration, proliferation, and function. Circ Casdiovasc Interv 2012; 5(4): 499– 507. 22763346
  22. [22]Liang C, Hu Y, Wang H. Biomimetic cardiovascular stents for in vivo re‐endothelialization. Biomaterials 2016; 103: 170– 182. 27380443
  23. [23]Cutiongco MFA, Goh SH, Aid‐Launais R, Le Visage C, Low HY, Yim EKF. Planar and tubular patterning of micro and nanotopographies on poly(vynil alcohol) hydrogel for improved endothelial cell responses. Biomaterials 2016; 84: 184– 195. 26828683
  24. [25]Pang JH, Farhatnia Y, Godarzi F, Tan A, Rajadas J, Cousins BG, Seifalian AM. In situ endothelialization: Bioengineering considerations to translation. Small 2015; 11(47): 6248– 6264. 26460851
  25. [28]Wang J, He Y, Maitz MF, Collins B, Xiong K, Guo L, Yun Y, Wan G, Huang N. A surface‐eroding poly(1,3‐trimethylene carbonate) coating for fully biodegradable magnesium‐based stent applications: Toward better biofunction, biodegradation and biocompatibility. Acta Biomater 2013; 9(10): 8678– 8689. 23467041
  26. [29]Parnham MJ, Wetzig H. Toxicity screening of liposomes. Chem Phys Lipids 1993; 64: 263– 274. 8242838
  27. [30]Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 5: Tests for cytotoxicity: In vitro methods. DIN EN ISO 10993 2009;5:1–7.
  28. [31]Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 4: Selection of tests for interactions with blood. DIN EN ISO 10993 2009;4:1–41.
  29. [32]Van Oeveren W. Obstacles in haemocompatibility testing. Scientifica 2013; 2013: 392584. 24278774 PMC3820147
  30. [33]Koh LB, Rodriguez I, Venkatraman SS. The effect of topography of polymer surfaces on platelet adhesion. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 1533– 1545. 19945746
  31. [35]Burkersroda FV. Schedl L, and Göpferich A. Why degradable polymers undergo surface or bulk erosion. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 4221– 4231. 12194525
  32. [36]Ortiz R, Quintana I, Etxarri J, Lejardi A, Sarasua J‐R. Picosecond laser ablation of poly‐L‐lactide: Effect of crystallinity on the material response. J Appl Phys 2011; 110: 094902.
  33. [37]Vandrangi P, Gott SC, Kozaka R, Rodgers VGJ, Rao MP. Comparative endothelial cell response on topographically patterned titanium and silicon substrates with micrometers to sub‐micrometer feature sizes. PLoS One 2014; 9(10): e111465. 25357245 PMC4214724
  34. [38]Athanasoulia IG, Tarantili PA. Preparation and characterization of polyethylene glycol/poly(L‐lactic acid) blends. Pure Appl Chem 2016; 89(1): 141– 152.
  35. [39]Eskin SG, Ives CL, McIntire LV, Navarro LT. Response of cultured endothelial cells to steady flow. Microvasc Res 1984; 28: 87– 94. 6748961
  36. [40]Cucina A, Sterpetti AV, Pupelis G, Fragale A, Lepidi S, Cavallaro A, Giustiniani Q, D'Angelo LS. Shear stress induces changes in the morphology and cytoskeleton organisation of arterial endothelial cells. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995; 9(1): 86– 92. 7664019
  37. [41]Chen L, Han D, Jiang L. On improving blood compatibility: From bioinspired to synthetic design and fabrication of biointerfacial topography at micro/nano scales. Colloids Surf B 2011; 85(1): 2– 7. 21106352
  38. [42]Lu J, Yao C, Yang L, Webster TJ. Decreased platelet adhesion and enhanced endothelial cell functions on nano and submicron‐rough titanium stents. Tissue Eng Part A 2012; 18: 13– 14. 22607484
  39. [43]Pham TT, Wiedemeier S, Maenz S, Gastrock G, Settmacher U, Jandt KD, Zanow J, Lüdecke C, Bossert J. Hemodynamic aspects of reduced platelet adhesion on bioinspired microstructured surfaces. Colloid Surf B 2016; 145: 502– 509. 27239904
  40. [44]Ye X, Shao Y‐L, Zhou M, Li J, Cai L. Research on microstructure and hemocompatibility of the artificial heart valve surface. Appl Surf Sci 2009; 255: 6686– 6690.
  41. [45]Ko TM, Jui‐Che L, Cooper SL. Surface characterization and platelet adhesion studies of plasma‐sulphonated polyethylene. Biomaterials 1993; 14(9): 657– 664. 8399962
  42. [46]Tan J, Shen H, Carter KL, Saltzman WM. Controlling human polymorphonuclear leukocytes motility using microfabrication technology. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 51(4): 694– 702. 10880118
  43. [47]Patel JD, Krupka T, Anderson JM. iNOS‐mediated generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species by biomaterial‐adherent neutrophils. J Biomed Mater Res 2007; 80A(2): 381– 390. 17001645

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pacharra, S., Ortiz, R., McMahon, S., Wang, W., Viebahn, R., Salber, J., & Quintana, I.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum (DE)
  • Ultraprecision Processes Unit, IK4‐TEKNIKER Technological Research Center Eibar Gipuzkoa Spain
  • Vornia Ltd, Laboratory A, Synergy Centre, Tallaght Dublin Ireland
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Tekniker (ES)
Corresponding author
Salber, Jochen
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-09
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
624-634
ISSN
  • 1552-4973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4981
OpenAlex
W2885679047
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Irish Research Council (EBPPG/2014/70)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Laser Material Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
surface microstructuring, picosecond laser ablation, endothelialization, endothelial cell alignment, hemocompatibility, biocompatibility, microgrooves, cardiac microvascular endothelial cells, hemolysis
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Cell Line, Humans, Materials Testing, Polyesters, Polyethylene Glycols, Surface Properties, Stents, Endothelial Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review