Cited by 69Bone health and osteoporosis researchNutrition and Health in AgingHIV-related health complications and treatments

Effect of Exercise Modality During Weight Loss on Bone Health in Older Adults With Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease or Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Beavers, Kristen M, Walkup, Michael P, Weaver, Ashley A, Lenchik, Leon, Kritchevsky, Stephen B, Nicklas, Barbara J, Ambrosius, Walter T, Stitzel, Joel D +4 more·2018·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the ability of either aerobic or resistance training to counter weight-loss-associated bone loss in older adults. There were 187 older adults (67 years, 70% women, 64% white) with obesity (BMI = 34.5 ± 3.7 kg/m2) and cardiovascular disease and/or metabolic syndrome who were randomized to participate in an 18-month, community-based trial, with a follow-up assessment at 30 months. Intervention arms included: weight loss alone (WL; 7% to 10% baseline weight), WL plus aerobic training (WL + AT), and WL plus resistance training (WL + RT), as well as DXA-acquired total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine areal bone mineral density (aBMD), and trabecular bone score (TBS). Biomarkers of bone turnover (procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide, C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen) were measured at baseline, 6, 18, and 30 (aBMD and TBS only) months. CT-acquired hip and spine volumetric BMD (vBMD), cortical thickness, and bone strength were measured in a subset at baseline (n = 55) and 18 months. Total hip aBMD was reduced by 2% in all groups at 18 months, with a primary analysis showing no significant treatment effects for any DXA, biomarker, or CT outcome. After adjustment for WL and follow-up at 30 months, secondary analyses revealed that total hip [−0.018 (−0.023 to −0.012) g/cm2 versus −0.025 (−0.031 to −0.019) g/cm2; p = 0.05] and femoral neck [−0.01 (−0.009 to 0.008) g/cm2 versus −0.011 (−0.020 to −0.002) g/cm2; p = 0.06] aBMD estimates were modestly attenuated in the WL + RT group compared with the WL group. Additionally, lumbar spine aBMD was increased in the WL [0.015 (0.007 to 0.024) g/cm2] and the WL + RT [0.009 (0.000 to 0.017) g/cm2] groups compared with the WL + AT [−0.003 (−0.012 to 0.005)g/cm2] group; both p ≤ 0.01. Community-based exercise does not prevent bone loss during active WL in older adults; however, adding RT may help minimize long-term hip bone loss. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbmr.3555

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A randomised controlled trial of 187 older adults with obesity and cardiometabolic disease found that resistance training can counteract the reduced bone mineral density following weight loss.

    “However, a RCT of 187 older adults with obesity and cardiometabolic disease found that resistance training can counteract the reduced bone mineral density following weight loss [56].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 69

Authors
Beavers, K. M., Walkup, M. P., Weaver, A. A., Lenchik, L., Kritchevsky, S. B., Nicklas, B. J., Ambrosius, W. T., Stitzel, J. D., Register, T. C., Shapses, S. A., Marsh, A. P., & Rejeski, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Beavers, Kristen M
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2018-08-07
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
2140-2149
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2885322429
Cited by
69
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R18 HL076441)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › HIV-related health complications and treatments
Keywords
bone health, weight loss, obesity, older adults, aerobic exercise, resistance training, bone mineral density, trabecular bone score, bone turnover markers, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome
MeSH terms
Aged, Bone and Bones, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Obesity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Biomarkers, Weight Loss, Exercise, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review