The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Abstract
The noninvasive assessment of bone turnover has received increasing attention over the past few years because of the need for sensitive markers in the clinical investigation of osteoporosis. Markers of bone formation include the serum measurement of total and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and type I collagen extension peptides. Assessment of bone resorption can be achieved with measurement of fasting urinary calcium and hydroxyproline, urinary hydroxylysine glycosides, urinary excretion of the pyridinium cross-links (pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline), and plasma tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity. Several studies performed in a variety of metabolic bone diseases have shown these markers to be of unequal sensitivity and specificity. In addition, some of them are not fully characterized. For assessment of the level of bone turnover in women with vertebral osteoporosis, serum osteocalcin and urinary pyridinoline appear to be the most sensitive markers so far. Programs combining bone mass measurement and assessment of bone turnover by several markers in women at the time of menopause are being developed in an attempt to improve the assessment of the risk for osteoporosis. Efforts are being made to develop more convenient assays and to identify other markers of bone turnover. A battery of various specific markers is likely to improve the assessment of the complex and subtle anormalities of bone metabolism that characterize metabolic bone diseases, especially the various aspects of osteoporosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hodges, S. J., Pilkington, M. J., Stamp, T. C. B., Catterall, A., Shearer, M. J., Bitensky, L., & Chayen, J. (1991) · Bone · doi:10.1016/8756-3282(91)90027-g · Cited by 143
Cited by
The clinical utility of bone marker measurements in osteoporosis
Wheater, G., Elshahaly, M., Tuck, S. P., Datta, H. K., & van Laar, J. M. (2013) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/1479-5876-11-201 · Cited by 322
Kimble, R. B., Matayoshi, A. B., Vannice, J. L., Kung, V. T., Williams, C., & Pacifici, R. (1995) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endo.136.7.7789332 · Cited by 273
Glucocorticoids and bone: Local effects and systemic implications
Henneicke, H., Gasparini, S. J., Brennan-Speranza, T. C., Zhou, H., & Seibel, M. J. (2014) · Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2013.12.006 · Cited by 168
Persistent Increase in Bone Turnover in Graves’ Patients with Subclinical Hyperthyroidism
Kumeda, Y., Inaba, M., Tahara, H., Kurioka, Y., Ishikawa, T., Morii, H., & Nishizawa, Y. (2000) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.85.11.6979 · Cited by 123
Bone turnover and bone mineral density in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia
Guo, C., Weetman, A. P., & Eastell, R. (1996) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.1996.00851.x · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Delmas, P. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-12-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- S549-S555
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2141591906
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650081323
- The paper
- Delmas, P. D. (1993). Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650081323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.