Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Peak bone mass in young women

Teegarden, Dorothy, Proulx, William R., Martin, Berdine R., Zhao, Jian, Mccabe, George P., Lyle, Roseann M., Peacock, Munro, Slemenda, Charles, Johnston, Conrad C., Weaver, Connie M.·1995·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

Increasing peak bone mineral density (BMD) or content (BMC) in young women may help to reduce the incidence of osteoporosis. Identifying the age when peak bone content or density is attained is essential to develop strategies aimed at optimizing peak BMD and BMC. Total body bone mineral density (TBBMD) and content (TBBMC) were measured by a dual X-ray absorptiometer in healthy females (n = 247, aged 11–32 years). TBBMD and TBBMC were modeled separately as a nonlinear function of age. By age 22.1 ± 2.5 years, 99% of peak BMD is attained, and by age 26.2 ± 3.7 years, 99% of peak BMC is attained. Nonlinear relationships between weight and TBBMD or TBBMC were also modeled. In this model, the influence of several parameters, including age, weight, and height, on BMC and BMD were simultaneously assessed. A model with age and weight described the best fit for TBBMD, whereas age, weight, and height described the best fit for total body TBBMC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbmr.5650100507

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Teegarden, D., Proulx, W. R., Martin, B. R., Zhao, J., Mccabe, G. P., Lyle, R. M., Peacock, M., Slemenda, C., Johnston, C. C., & Weaver, C. M.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
1995-05-01
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
711-715
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2114854638
Cited by
301
References
1
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.