Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Changes in bone mineral density and markers of bone remodeling during lactation and postweaning in women consuming high amounts of calcium

Cross, Nanna A., Hillman, Laura S., Allen, Susan H., Krause, Gary F.·1995·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

A randomized clinical intervention trial to determine effects of lactation and 1 g of calcium (Ca) on bone remodeling was conducted in 15 women (calcium = 7, placebo [P] = 8) consuming 1.3–2.4 g of Ca/day from diet + prenatal supplement. Study periods were baseline, ≤2 weeks postpartum; lactation, 3 months lactation; and postweaning, 3 months postweaning. Bone mineral density (BMD) corrected for body weight was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Indicators of calcium metabolism, bone turnover, and lactation were measured: calcium metabolism, parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25[OH]2D); bone turnover, formation, procollagen I carboxypeptides (PICP), osteocalcin, and bone alkaline phosphatase (B-ALP), resorption, tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP); and lactation, prolactin (PRL). Mean BMD changes differed by site: baseline to lactation –4.3% (P) (p < 0.04) and –6.3% (Ca) (p < 0.01) at the lumbar spine (L2–L4) and 5.7% gains of the ultradistal (UD) radius (Ca) (p < 0.04); lactation to postweaning, –6% to –11% at all sites of the radius and ulna (Ca, P) (p < 0.04) +3% at L2–L4 (Ca) (p < 0.03); baseline to postweaning, (UD) radius –5.2% (P) (p < 0.03), UD radius + ulna –6% to –8% (Ca, P) (p < 0.04) but no significant loss of L2–L4 or total body. Bone turnover markers were higher at lactation than postweaning: PICP (+34%, p < 0.001), osteocalcin (+25%, p < 0.01), TRAP (+11%, p < 0.005) as was PRL (+81%, p < 0.001). Indicators of calcium metabolism were higher postweaning than lactation for PTH (+40%, p < 0.01) and 25(OH)D (+45%, p < 0.02) but not for 1,25(OH)2D. There were no differences between P or Ca for indices of calcium metabolism, bone turnover, or PRL. An increase in markers of bone turnover and a loss of BMD of the spine during lactation appears to be part of the physiological changes of lactation and not preventable by increasing calcium intake above the recommended dietary allowance (RDA). A return of BMD toward baseline of the spine but not the arm, was associated with an increase in PTH without an increase in 1,25(OH)2D postweaning. Loss of estrogen during lactation and a return postweaning may play an important role.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbmr.5650100907

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Cross, N. A., Hillman, L. S., Allen, S. H., & Krause, G. F.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
1995-09-01
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
1312-1320
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2042430322
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in bone mineral density and markers of bone remodeling during lactation and postweaning in women consuming high amounts of calcium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650100907
The paper
Cross, N. A., Hillman, L. S., Allen, S. H., & Krause, G. F. (1995). Changes in bone mineral density and markers of bone remodeling during lactation and postweaning in women consuming high amounts of calcium. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650100907

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.