Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adverse reactions associated with mobile therapeutic apheresis: analysis of 17,940 procedures.

Kiprov, Dobri D., Golden, Patricia, Rohe, Regina, Smith, Sheila, Hofmann, Jan, Hunnicutt, John·2001·Journal of Clinical Apheresis

Abstract

In order to evaluate the nature and frequency of adverse reactions associated with Therapeutic Apheresis (TA), database information from two large mobile apheresis services was analyzed. A total of 17,940 procedures performed on 3,583 patients were studied using an Access Database. Seventy percent (12,558) of the procedures were performed on a Fresenius AS104 blood cell separator and 30% (5,382) were performed on a COBE Spectra. The five most commonly treated diseases were Guillain‐Barre Syndrome (25%), thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (20%), myasthenia gravis (18%), the hyperviscosity syndrome (12%), and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (9%). All patients received calcium gluconate supplement during the procedures. Cardiac monitoring was used during 80% of the procedures and blood pressure monitoring was used during all procedures. All procedures were supervised by a physician. Both apheresis services fully comply with the ASFA Guidelines for Therapeutic Apheresis Providers. Adverse reactions occurred in 3.9% of all procedures. The following adverse reactions were documented: reactions related to ACD toxicity (3%), vasovagal reactions (0.5%), vascular access related complications (0.15%), reactions related to FFP (0.12%), hepatitis B from FFP (0.06%), arrhythmias (0.01%), hemolysis due to inappropriate dilution of 25% albumin (0.01%), and one death (from underlying disease) during a TA procedure (0.006%). These data demonstrate that therapeutic apheresis is associated with a low rate of side effects when performed by well‐trained and certified nurses under the direction of experienced physicians, even in the diverse setting of large mobile therapeutic apheresis programs. J Clin Apheresis 16:130–133, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jca.1024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a procedure for human patients analogous to NBE, called Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE), which is FDA approved and routinely used in the clinic.

    “there is a procedure for human patients analogous to NBE, where most of the plasma is replaced by physiologic solution supplemented with commercial human albumin, called Therapeutic Plasma Exchange, TPE, which is FDA approved and routinely used in the clinic [16–18].”
  • Human blood samples were provided under an IRB approved by Sutter Health, without personal identifiers, and were not linked to or traced back to personal information.

    “On shelf samples of human blood (collected through the FDA approved and routinely used in the clinic procedure of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange [16–18]) were provided to us by Dr. Dobri Kiprov (IRB Approved by Sutter health, 648823) without personal identifiers and were not linked to or traced back to any personal information in our study.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.7326/0003-4819-131-6-199909210-00011 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1101(2000)15:1/2<1::AID-JCA1>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  3. 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1989.29289146829.x · DOI
  4. 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1986.26286152904.x · DOI
  5. Puig L, 1985, Adverse effects secondary to the treatment with plasma exchange, Int J Artif Organs, 8, 156, 10.1177/039139888500800309 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1984.tb00086.x · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0955-3886(95)00039-9 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/jca.2920090102 · DOI
  9. McLeod BC, 1996, Organizational Guidelines for Therapeutic Apheresis Facilities. A document prepared by ASFA Standards and Education Committee, J Clin Apheresis, 11, 42
  10. 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39399219285.x · DOI
  11. Huestis DW, 1989, Risks and safety practices in hemapheresis procedures, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 113, 273
  12. 10.1001/archneur.1982.00510180028007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kiprov, D. D., Golden, P., Rohe, R., Smith, S., Hofmann, J., & Hunnicutt, J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
130-133
ISSN
  • 0733-2459
  • 1098-1101
Cited by
46
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review