Cited by 222Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchMesenchymal stem cell researchBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

Teratomas from pluripotent stem cells: A clinical hurdle

Fong, Chui‐Yee, Gauthaman, Kalamegam, Bongso, Ariff·2010·Journal of Cellular Biochemistry

Abstract

Although basic research on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) at the laboratory bench has progressed with enviable speed there has been little head way in terms of its clinical application. A look at the Internet however shows several stem cell clinics worldwide offering direct transplantation of undifferentiated hESCs to patients for the cure of a variety of diseases before bona fide evidence-based results can be demonstrated from large controlled studies. This raises concern because reliable protocols have to be first developed to resolve the three major hurdles delaying clinical trials such as inadequate cell numbers, immunorejection and tumorigenesis. Cell expansion methods using bioreactors, rotary culture and mitotic agents have now been developed to generate stem cell derivatives in large numbers. The problem of immunorejection can now be overcome with the development of indirect and direct reprogramming protocols to personalize tissues to patients (human induced pluripotent stem cells, hiPSCs; nuclear transfer stem cells, NTSCs; induced neuronal cells, iN). However, hESC, hiPSC, and NTSCs being pluripotent have the disadvantage of teratoma formation in vivo which has to be carefully addressed so as to provide safe stem cell based therapies to the patient. This review addresses the issue of tumorigenesis and discusses approaches by which this concern may be overcome and at the same time emphasizes the need to concurrently explore alternative stem cell sources that do n…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcb.22775

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Highly proliferative uncommitted progenitors or residual hPSCs in the final SC-islet product have the potential to form tumors.

    “Of greatest concern is the potential for highly proliferative uncommitted progenitors or residual hPSCs to be present in the final SC-islet product that have the potential to form tumors.158–160”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 121 · Cited by 222

Authors
Fong, C., Gauthaman, K., & Bongso, A.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Bongso, Ariff
Venue
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-25
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
769-781
ISSN
  • 0730-2312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4644
OpenAlex
W1995765796
Cited by
222
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 31
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cellular Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
teratoma formation, pluripotent stem cells, human embryonic stem cells, human induced pluripotent stem cells, carcinogenesis, stem cell therapy safety, stem cell clinics, cell expansion, immune rejection, reprogramming, multipotent stem cells
MeSH terms
Biological Assay, Humans, Teratoma, Stem Cell Transplantation, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Nuclear Transfer Techniques, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review