Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Isolation and characterization of mesenchymal stem cells from human umbilical cord blood: Reevaluation of critical factors for successful isolation and high ability to proliferate and differentiate to chondrocytes as compared to mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue

Zhang, Xiaohong, Hirai, Masako, Cantero, Susana, Ciubotariu, Rodica, Dobrila, Ludy, Hirsh, Allen, Igura, Koichi, Satoh, Hitoshi, Yokomi, Izuru, Nishimura, Toshihide, Yamaguchi, Satoru, Yoshimura, Kotaro, Rubinstein, Pablo, Takahashi, Tsuneo A.·2011·Journal of Cellular Biochemistry

Abstract

Human umbilical cord blood (CB) is a potential source for mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) capable of forming specific tissues, for example, bone, cartilage, or muscle. However, difficulty isolating MSC from CB (CB‐MSC) has impeded their clinical application. Using more than 450 CB units donated to two public CB banks, we found that successful cell recovery fits a hyper‐exponential function of time since birth with very high fidelity. Additionally, significant improvement in the isolation of CB‐MSC was achieved by selecting cord blood units having a volume ≥90 ml and time ≤2 h after donor's birth. This resulted in 90% success in isolation of CB‐MSC by density gradient purification and without a requirement for immunoaffinity methods as previously reported. Using MSC isolated from bone marrow (BM‐MSC) and adipose tissue (AT‐MSC) as reference controls, we observed that CB‐MSC exhibited a higher proliferation rate and expanded to the order of the 1 × 10 9 cells required for cell therapies. CB‐MSC showed karyotype stability after prolonged expansion. Functionally, CB‐MSC could be more readily induced to differentiate into chondrocytes than could BM‐MSC and AT‐MSC. CB‐MSC showed immunosuppressive activity equal to that of BM‐MSC and AT‐MSC. Collectively, our data indicate that viable CB‐MSC could be obtained consistently and that CB should be reconsidered as a practical source of MSC for cell therapy and regenerative medicine using the well established CB banking system. J. Cell. Biochem. 112: 1206–1218, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcb.23042

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, X., Hirai, M., Cantero, S., Ciubotariu, R., Dobrila, L., Hirsh, A., Igura, K., Satoh, H., Yokomi, I., Nishimura, T., Yamaguchi, S., Yoshimura, K., Rubinstein, P., & Takahashi, T. A.
Venue
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-11
Volume
112
Issue
4
Pages
1206-1218
ISSN
  • 0730-2312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4644
OpenAlex
W2145769955
Cited by
248
References
2
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.