Identification of potential selective autophagy receptors from protein‐content profiling of autophagosomes
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Selective autophagy receptors (SARs) are central to cellular homeostatic and organellar recycling pathways. Over the last two decades, more than 30 SARs have been discovered and validated using a variety of experimental approaches ranging from cell biology to biochemistry, including high‐throughput imaging and screening methods. Yet, the extent of selective autophagy pathways operating under various cellular contexts, for example, under basal and starvation conditions, remains unresolved. Currently, our knowledge of all known SARs and their associated cargo components is fragmentary and limited by experimental data with varying degrees of resolution. Here, we use classical predictive and modeling approaches to integrate high‐quality autophagosome content profiling data with disparate datasets. We identify a global set of potential SARs and their associated cargo components active under basal autophagy, starvation‐induced, and proteasome‐inhibition conditions. We provide a detailed account of cellular components, biochemical pathways, and molecular processes that are degraded via autophagy. Our analysis yields a catalog of new potential SARs that satisfy the characteristics of bonafide, well‐characterized SARs. We categorize them by the subcellular compartments they emerge from and classify them based on their likely mode of action. Our structural modeling validates a large subset of predicted interactions with the human ATG8 family of proteins and shows characteristic, conserved LC3‐interacting region (LIR)–LIR docking site (LDS) and ubiquitin‐interacting motif (UIM)–UIM docking site (UDS) binding modes. Our analysis also revealed the most abundant cargo molecules targeted by these new SARs. Our findings expand the repertoire of SARs and provide unprecedented details into the global autophagic state of HeLa cells. Taken together, our findings provide motivation for the design of new experiments, testing the role of these novel factors in selective autophagy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum turnover by selective autophagy
Khaminets, A., Heinrich, T., Mari, M., Grumati, P., Huebner, A. K., Akutsu, M., Liebmann, L., Stolz, A., Nietzsche, S., Koch, N., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14498 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AlphaFold2 SLiM screen for LC3-LIR interactions in autophagy
Stuke, J. F. M., & Hummer, G. (2025) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2025.2493999 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cristiani, A., Dutta, A., Poveda‐Cuevas, S. A., Kern, A., & Bhaskara, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Institute of Biochemistry II, School of Medicine Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bhaskara, Ramachandra M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-04-23
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e30405-e30405
- ISSN
- 0730-2312 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4644
- OpenAlex
- W4366776566
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cellular Biochemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Keywords
- selective autophagy receptors, Atg8-family proteins, LC3-interacting region, ubiquitin-interacting motif, starvation-induced autophagy, proteasome inhibition, HeLa cells, protein-protein interaction prediction
- MeSH terms
- Autophagosomes, Autophagy, HeLa Cells, Humans, Microtubule-Associated Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review