The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Consistent treatment of inter‐ and intramolecular polarization in molecular mechanics calculations
Abstract
A protocol is described for the treatment of molecular polarization in force field calculations. The resulting model is consistent in that both inter‐ and intramolecular polarization are handled within a single scheme. An analytical formula for removing intramolecular polarization from a set of atomic multipoles for an arbitrary static structure or conformation is given. With the help of the intramolecular polarization, these permanent atomic multipoles can then be applied in modeling alternative conformations of a molecule. Equipped with this simple technique, one can derive transferable electrostatic parameters for peptides and proteins using flexible model compounds such as dipeptides. The proposed procedure is tested for its ability to describe the electrostatic potential around various configurations of the N‐methylacetamide dimer. The effect of different intramolecular polarization schemes on the accuracy of a force field model of the electrostatic potential of alanine dipeptide is investigated. A group‐based scheme for including direct intramolecular polarization is shown to be most successful in accounting for the conformational dependence of electrostatic potentials. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 23: 1497–1506, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field
Ponder, J. W., Wu, C., Ren, P., Pande, V. S., Chodera, J. D., Schnieders, M. J., Haque, I., Mobley, D. L., Lambrecht, D. S., DiStasio, R. A., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp910674d · Cited by 1,440
Self-citationSimulation of Ca2+ and Mg2+ Solvation Using Polarizable Atomic Multipole Potential
Jiao, D., King, C., Grossfield, A., Darden, T. A., & Ren, P. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp062230r · Cited by 278
Self-citationRaiteri, P., Schuitemaker, A., & Gale, J. D. (2020) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c01582 · Cited by 63
Beretta, G., Arlandini, E., Artali, R., Anton, J. M. G., & Maffei Facino, R. (2008) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2008.02.012 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Ren, P., & Ponder, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1497-1506
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2062845464
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consistent treatment of inter‐ and intramolecular polarization in molecular mechanics calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.10127
- The paper
- Ren, P., & Ponder, J. W. (2002). Consistent treatment of inter‐ and intramolecular polarization in molecular mechanics calculations. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.