Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,426

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation

Jakalian, Araz, Jack, David B., Bayly, Christopher I.·2002·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Abstract

We present the first global parameterization and validation of a novel charge model, called AM1‐BCC, which quickly and efficiently generates high‐quality atomic charges for computer simulations of organic molecules in polar media. The goal of the charge model is to produce atomic charges that emulate the HF/6‐31G* electrostatic potential (ESP) of a molecule. Underlying electronic structure features, including formal charge and electron delocalization, are first captured by AM1 population charges; simple additive bond charge corrections (BCCs) are then applied to these AM1 atomic charges to produce the AM1‐BCC charges. The parameterization of BCCs was carried out by fitting to the HF/6‐31G* ESP of a training set of >2700 molecules. Most organic functional groups and their combinations were sampled, as well as an extensive variety of cyclic and fused bicyclic heteroaryl systems. The resulting BCC parameters allow the AM1‐BCC charging scheme to handle virtually all types of organic compounds listed in The Merck Index and the NCI Database. Validation of the model was done through comparisons of hydrogen‐bonded dimer energies and relative free energies of solvation using AM1‐BCC charges in conjunction with the 1994 Cornell et al. forcefield for AMBER.13 Homo‐ and hetero‐dimer hydrogen‐bond energies of a diverse set of organic molecules were reproduced to within 0.95 kcal/mol RMS deviation from the ab initio values, and for DNA dimers the energies were within 0.9 kcal/mol RMS deviation from ab initio values. The calculated relative free energies of solvation for a diverse set of monofunctional isosteres were reproduced to within 0.69 kcal/mol of experiment. In all these validation tests, AMBER with the AM1‐BCC charge model maintained a correlation coefficient above 0.96. Thus, the parameters presented here for use with the AM1‐BCC method present a fast, accurate, and robust alternative to HF/6‐31G* ESP‐fit charges for general use with the AMBER force field in computer simulations involving organic small molecules. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 23: 1623–1641, 2002

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.10128

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3,426

Metadata

Authors
Jakalian, A., Jack, D. B., & Bayly, C. I.
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10-18
Volume
23
Issue
16
Pages
1623-1641
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W2037535298
Cited by
3,426
References
0
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.10128
The paper
Jakalian, A., Jack, D. B., & Bayly, C. I. (2002). Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10128

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.