The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function
Abstract
Based on recent developments in generalized Born (GB) theory that employ rapid volume integration schemes (M. S. Lee, F. R. Salabury, Jr., and C. L. Brooks III, J Chem Phys 2002, 116, 10606) we have recast the calculation of the self‐electrostatic solvation energy to utilize a simple smoothing function at the dielectric boundary. The present GB model is formulated in this manner to provide consistency with the Poisson–Boltzmann (PB) theory previously developed to yield numerically stable electrostatic solvation forces based on finite‐difference methods (W. Im, D. Beglov, and B. Roux, Comp Phys Commun 1998, 111, 59). Our comparisons show that the present GB model is indeed an efficient and accurate approach to reproduce corresponding PB solvation energies and forces. With only two adjustable parameters—a0 to modulate the Coulomb field term, and a1 to include a correction term beyond Coulomb field—the PB solvation energies are reproduced within 1% error on average for a variety of proteins. Detailed analysis shows that the PB energy can be reproduced within 2% absolute error with a confidence of about 95%. In addition, the solvent‐exposed surface area of a biomolecule, as commonly used in calculations of the nonpolar solvation energy, can be calculated accurately and efficiently using the simple smoothing function and the volume integration method. Our implicit solvent GB calculations are about 4.5 times slower than the corresponding vacuum calculations. Using the simple smoothing function makes the present GB model roughly three times faster than GB models, which attempt to mimic the Lee–Richards molecular volume. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 24: 1691–1702, 2003
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hermann, R. B. (1972) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100663a023 · Cited by 700
Cited by
CHARMM‐GUI: A web‐based graphical user interface for CHARMM
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G., & Im, W. (2008) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20945 · Cited by 9,284
Self-citationCHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program
Brooks, B. R., Brooks, C. L., Mackerell, A. D., Nilsson, L., Petrella, R. J., Roux, B., Won, Y., Archontis, G., Bartels, C., Boresch, S., et al. (2009) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21287 · Cited by 8,939
Self-citationThe VSGB 2.0 model: A next generation energy model for high resolution protein structure modeling
Li, J., Abel, R., Zhu, K., Cao, Y., Zhao, S., & Friesner, R. A. (2011) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.23106 · Cited by 1,159
Feig, M., & Brooks, C. L. (2004) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2004.03.009 · Cited by 566
Self-citationProtein-Folding Dynamics: Overview of Molecular Simulation Techniques
Scheraga, H. A., Khalili, M., & Liwo, A. (2007) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104614 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Im, W., Lee, M. S., & Brooks, C. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08-25
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1691-1702
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2107317356
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.10321
- The paper
- Im, W., Lee, M. S., & Brooks, C. L. (2003). Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.