The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A kinematic view of loop closure
Abstract
We consider the problem of loop closure, i.e., of finding the ensemble of possible backbone structures of a chain segment of a protein molecule that is geometrically consistent with preceding and following parts of the chain whose structures are given. We reduce this problem of determining the loop conformations of six torsions to finding the real roots of a 16th degree polynomial in one variable, based on the robotics literature on the kinematics of the equivalent rotator linkage in the most general case of oblique rotators. We provide a simple intuitive view and derivation of the polynomial for the case in which each of the three pair of torsional axes has a common point. Our method generalizes previous work on analytical loop closure in that the torsion angles need not be consecutive, and any rigid intervening segments are allowed between the free torsions. Our approach also allows for a small degree of flexibility in the bond angles and the peptide torsion angles; this substantially enlarges the space of solvable configurations as is demonstrated by an application of the method to the modeling of cyclic pentapeptides. We give further applications to two important problems. First, we show that this analytical loop closure algorithm can be efficiently combined with an existing loop‐construction algorithm to sample loops longer than three residues. Second, we show that Monte Carlo minimization is made severalfold more efficient by employing the local moves generated by the loop closure algorithm, when applied to the global minimization of an eight‐residue loop. Our loop closure algorithm is freely available at http://dillgroup. ucsf.edu/loop_closure/. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 25: 510–528, 2004
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Cited by
Leaver-Fay (2011) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · Cited by 1,904
GalaxyRefine: protein structure refinement driven by side-chain repacking
Heo, L., Park, H., & Seok, C. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt458 · Cited by 1,363
Self-citationProtein Structure Modeling with MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2014) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0366-5_1 · Cited by 549
CHARMM-GUI supports the Amber force fields
Lee, J., Hitzenberger, M., Rieger, M., Kern, N. R., Zacharias, M., & Im, W. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0012280 · Cited by 428
Principal component analysis of molecular dynamics: On the use of Cartesian vs. internal coordinates
Sittel, F., Jain, A., & Stock, G. (2014) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4885338 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Coutsias, E. A., Seok, C., Jacobson, M. P., & Dill, K. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01-13
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 510-528
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2137604324
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A kinematic view of loop closure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.10416
- The paper
- Coutsias, E. A., Seok, C., Jacobson, M. P., & Dill, K. A. (2004). A kinematic view of loop closure. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.