The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular mechanical models for organic and biological systems going beyond the atom centered two body additive approximation: aqueous solution free energies of methanol and N‐methyl acetamide, nucleic acid base, and amide hydrogen bonding and chloroform/water partition coefficients of the nucleic acid bases
Abstract
We have developed a methodology to derive RESP charges for molecular mechanical models that include “lone pairs” on lone‐pair donor sites and atom‐centered polarizabilities. This approach uses a very high level ab initio cc‐pVTZ basis set,1 where the multipole moments of the molecules are as accurate as possible. The partial charges are derived self‐consistently so that the model, whose electrostatic potential comes from both partial charges and induced dipoles, reproduces the quantum mechanical electrostatic potential. We then study the ability of such models to reproduce the aqueous solvation free energy of methanol and N‐methyl acetamide (NMA), the base pair hydrogen bonding of the 26 base pairs analyzed by Hobza et al. and the chloroform/water partition coefficients of the five N‐methyl substituted nucleic acid bases. The base pair H‐bond energies are described as well as the atom centered additive model, after modifying the van der Waals parameter on the NH to give reasonable base pair H‐bond distances. The experimental solvation free energies (gas→water) of methanol and NMA are well described, and the water/CHCl 3 partition coefficients are improved over the additive model, without any parameter changes. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 22: 1048–1057, 2001
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Cited by
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
QM/MM Methods for Biomolecular Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200802019 · Cited by 2,684
Force Fields for Protein Simulations
Ponder, J. W., & Case, D. A. (2003) · Advances in Protein Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(03)66002-x · Cited by 1,903
Optimized Molecular Dynamics Force Fields Applied to the Helix−Coil Transition of Polypeptides
Best, R. B., & Hummer, G. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp901540t · Cited by 833
Metadata
- Authors
- Cieplak, P., Caldwell, J., & Kollman, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05-30
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1048-1057
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2137195231
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular mechanical models for organic and biological systems going beyond the atom centered two body additive approximation: aqueous solution free energies of methanol and N‐methyl acetamide, nucleic acid base, and amide hydrogen bonding and chloroform/water partition coefficients of the nucleic acid bases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.1065
- The paper
- Cieplak, P., Caldwell, J., & Kollman, P. (2001). Molecular mechanical models for organic and biological systems going beyond the atom centered two body additive approximation: aqueous solution free energies of methanol and N‐methyl acetamide, nucleic acid base, and amide hydrogen bonding and chloroform/water partition coefficients of the nucleic acid bases. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.1065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.