Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hildebrand and Hansen solubility parameters from Molecular Dynamics with applications to electronic nose polymer sensors

Belmares, M., Blanco, M., Goddard, W. A., Ross, R. B., Caldwell, G., Chou, S.‐H., Pham, J., Olofson, P. M., Thomas, Cristina·2004·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Abstract

We introduce the Cohesive Energy Density (CED) method, a multiple sampling Molecular Dynamics computer simulation procedure that may offer higher consistency in the estimation of Hildebrand and Hansen solubility parameters. The use of a multiple sampling technique, combined with a simple but consistent molecular force field and quantum mechanically determined atomic charges, allows for the precise determination of solubility parameters in a systematic way (σ = 0.4 hildebrands). The CED method yields first‐principles Hildebrand parameter predictions in good agreement with experiment [root‐mean‐square (rms) = 1.1 hildebrands]. We apply the CED method to model the Caltech electronic nose, an array of 20 polymer sensors. Sensors are built with conducting leads connected through thin‐film polymers loaded with carbon black. Odorant detection relies on a change in electric resistivity of the polymer film as function of the amount of swelling caused by the odorant compound. The amount of swelling depends upon the chemical composition of the polymer and the odorant molecule. The pattern is unique, and unambiguously identifies the compound. Experimentally determined changes in relative resistivity of seven polymer sensors upon exposure to 24 solvent vapors were modeled with the CED estimated Hansen solubility components. Predictions of polymer sensor responses result in Pearson R2 coefficients between 0.82 and 0.99. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 25: 1814–1826, 2004

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.20098

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Belmares, M., Blanco, M., Goddard, W. A., Ross, R. B., Caldwell, G., Chou, S. ‐., Pham, J., Olofson, P. M., & Thomas, C.
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-31
Volume
25
Issue
15
Pages
1814-1826
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W2098474447
Cited by
411
References
23
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hildebrand and Hansen solubility parameters from Molecular Dynamics with applications to electronic nose polymer sensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.20098
The paper
Belmares, M., Blanco, M., Goddard, W. A., Ross, R. B., Caldwell, G., Chou, S. ‐., Pham, J., Olofson, P. M., & Thomas, C. (2004). Hildebrand and Hansen solubility parameters from Molecular Dynamics with applications to electronic nose polymer sensors. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20098

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.