The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interfacing Q‐Chem and CHARMM to perform QM/MM reaction path calculations
Abstract
A hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) potential energy function with Hartree‐Fock, density functional theory (DFT), and post‐HF (RIMP2, MP2, CCSD) capability has been implemented in the CHARMM and Q‐Chem software packages. In addition, we have modified CHARMM and Q‐Chem to take advantage of the newly introduced replica path and the nudged elastic band methods, which are powerful techniques for studying reaction pathways in a highly parallel (i.e., parallel/parallel) fashion, with each pathway point being distributed to a different node of a large cluster. To test our implementation, a series of systems were studied and comparisons were made to both full QM calculations and previous QM/MM studies and experiments. For instance, the differences between HF, DFT, MP2, and CCSD QM/MM calculations of H2O···H2O, H2O···Na+, and H2O···Cl− complexes have been explored. Furthermore, the recently implemented polarizable Drude water model was used to make comparisons to the popular TIP3P and TIP4P water models for doing QM/MM calculations. We have also computed the energetic profile of the chorismate mutase catalyzed Claisen rearrangement at various QM/MM levels of theory and have compared the results with previous studies. Our best estimate for the activation energy is 8.20 kcal/mol and for the reaction energy is −23.1 kcal/mol, both calculated at the MP2/6‐31+G(d)//MP2/6‐31+G(d)/C22 level of theory. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2007
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
QM/MM Methods for Biomolecular Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200802019 · Cited by 2,684
Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2009) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b907148b · Cited by 1,648
Brunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
Molecular reactions at aqueous interfaces
Ruiz-Lopez, M. F., Francisco, J. S., Martins-Costa, M. T. C., & Anglada, J. M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-020-0203-2 · Cited by 411
Jiang, W., & Roux, B. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct1001768 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Woodcock, H. L., Hodošček, M., Gilbert, A. T. B., Gill, P. M. W., Schaefer, H. F., & Brooks, B. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1485-1502
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2035460800
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interfacing Q‐Chem and CHARMM to perform QM/MM reaction path calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.20587
- The paper
- Woodcock, H. L., Hodošček, M., Gilbert, A. T. B., Gill, P. M. W., Schaefer, H. F., & Brooks, B. R. (2007). Interfacing Q‐Chem and CHARMM to perform QM/MM reaction path calculations. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20587
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.