Cited by 2,246Computational Drug Discovery MethodsAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A semiempirical free energy force field with charge‐based desolvation

Open access
Huey, Ruth, Morris, Garrett M., Olson, Arthur J., Goodsell, David S.·2007·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Abstract

The authors describe the development and testing of a semiempirical free energy force field for use in AutoDock4 and similar grid‐based docking methods. The force field is based on a comprehensive thermodynamic model that allows incorporation of intramolecular energies into the predicted free energy of binding. It also incorporates a charge‐based method for evaluation of desolvation designed to use a typical set of atom types. The method has been calibrated on a set of 188 diverse protein–ligand complexes of known structure and binding energy, and tested on a set of 100 complexes of ligands with retroviral proteases. The force field shows improvement in redocking simulations over the previous AutoDock3 force field. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2007

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.20634

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 21 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Huey, R., Morris, G. M., Olson, A. J., & Goodsell, D. S.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Goodsell, David S.
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1145-1152
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W2165526004
Cited by
2,246
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 126 · 2016: 121 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 116 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 151
FWCI
130.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Computational Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM048870, P01 GM48870, R01GM069832)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein-ligand docking, desolvation, binding free energy, retroviral protease, redocking, force field calibration
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Hydrogen Bonding, Ligands, Mathematical Computing, Models, Chemical, Models, Molecular, Molecular Conformation, Protein Binding, Proteins, Software, Thermodynamics, Water, Drug Design, HIV Protease, HIV Protease Inhibitors, Databases, Protein, Static Electricity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review