Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GEPOL: An improved description of molecular surfaces II. Computing the molecular area and volume

Silla, Estanislao, Tuñón, Iñaki, Pascual‐Ahuir, Juan Luis·1991·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Abstract

The algorithm used by the program GEPOL for a finer description of molecular surface (for a fast calculation of molecular area and volume and for an efficient selection of sampling points) is presented in detail. Different types of surfaces such as van der Waals and Richard's molecular surfaces can be computed. As we described in the first article (J.L. Pascual‐Ahuir and E. Silla, J. Comp. Chem., 11, 1047(1990)), GEPOL begins by building a set of spherical surfaces which fill the space which is not solvent accessible. In this second article, a triangular tessellation approach to select the parts of these spherical surfaces which form the molecular surface is described. By using a data coded generic pentakisdodecahedron, each spherical surface is divided in triangular tesserae. A simple method is used to eliminate all triangles found at the intersection volume of the spheres. The center coordinates and the surface of the remaining triangles are used in order to calculate the molecular area and volume and as starting point of the graphic representation of scalar and vector properties. We study the behavior of the method, presenting several examples of application. Special attention is given to the accuracy, spatial invariance and computer efficiency measured by CPU time. Some models of aligned spheres whose area and volume can be found exactly allow us to do a comparative study with a well‐known method, analyzing their behavior in line with their respective graining parameters. A fragment of protein is used as an example of the application of the method for characterizing biomolecular surfaces. Aqueous solubility of organic compounds is studied as an example of the experimental property that depends on the molecular area obtaining a good correlation between the logarithm of the solubility and the area calculated using GEPOL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.540120905

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

  • Chemistry with ADF

    te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152

Metadata

Authors
Silla, E., Tuñón, I., & Pascual‐Ahuir, J. L.
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-11
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
1077-1088
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W2045371864
Cited by
254
References
1
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.