The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of atomic charges derived via different procedures
Abstract
Atomic charges were obtained from ab initio molecular orbital calculations using a variety of procedures to compare them and assess their utility. Two procedures based on the molecular orbitals were examined, the Mulliken population analysis and the Weinhold–Reed Natural Population Analysis. Two procedures using the charge density distribution were included; the Hirshfeld procedure and Bader's Atoms in Molecules method. Charges also were derived by fitting the electrostatic potential (CHELPG) and making use of the atomic polar tensors (GAPT). The procedures were first examined for basis set independence, and then applied to a group of hydrocarbons. The dipole moments for these molecules were computed from the various atomic charges and compared to the total SCF dipole moments. This was followed by an examination of a series of substituted methanes, simple hydrides, and a group of typical organic compounds such as carbonyl derivatives, nitriles, and nitro compounds. In some cases, the ability of the charges to reproduce electrostatic potentials was examined. © John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152
Improved grid‐based algorithm for Bader charge allocation
Sanville, E., Kenny, S. D., Smith, R., & Henkelman, G. (2007) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20575 · Cited by 4,287
Kohn‐Sham Density Functional Theory: Predicting and Understanding Chemistry
Bickelhaupt, F. M., & Baerends, E. J. (2000) · Reviews in Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9780470125922.ch1 · Cited by 1,291
Fonseca Guerra, C., Handgraaf, J., Baerends, E. J., & Bickelhaupt, F. M. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.10351 · Cited by 1,202
Weinhold, F. (2012) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.23060 · Cited by 767
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiberg, K. B., & Rablen, P. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1504-1518
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2053856735
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of atomic charges derived via different procedures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.540141213
- The paper
- Wiberg, K. B., & Rablen, P. R. (1993). Comparison of atomic charges derived via different procedures. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540141213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.