The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New spherical‐cutoff methods for long‐range forces in macromolecular simulation
Abstract
New atom‐ and group‐based spherical‐cutoff methods have been developed for the treatment of nonbonded interactions in molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. A new atom‐based method, force switching, leaves short‐range forces unaltered by adding a constant to the potential energy, switching forces smoothly to zero over a specified range. A simple improvement to group‐based cutoffs is presented: Switched group‐shifting shifts the group–group potential energy by a constant before being switched smoothly to zero. Also introduced are generalizations of atom‐based force shifting, which adds a constant to the Coulomb force between two charges. These new approaches are compared to existing methods by evaluating the energy of a model hydrogen‐bonding system consisting of two N‐methyl acetamide molecules and by full MD simulation. Thirty‐five 150 ps simulations of carboxymyoglobin (MbCO) hydrated by 350 water molecules indicate that the new methods and atom‐based shifting are each able to approximate no‐cutoff results when a cutoff at or beyond 12 Å is used. However, atom‐based potential‐energy switching and truncation unacceptably contaminate group–group electrostatic interactions. Group‐based potential truncation should not be used in the presence of explicit water or other mobile electrostatic dipoles because energy is not a state function with this method, resulting in severe heating (about 4 K/ps in the simulations of hydrated MbCO). The distance‐dependent dielectric (ϵ ∝︁ r) is found to alter the temperature dependence of protein dynamics, suppressing anharmonic motion at high temperatures. Force switching and force shifting are the best atom‐based spherical cutoffs, whereas switched group‐shifting is the preferred group‐based method. To achieve realistic simulations, increasing the cutoff distance from 7.5 to 12 Å or beyond is much more important than the differences among the three best cutoff methods. © 1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A smooth particle mesh Ewald method
Essmann, U., Perera, L., Berkowitz, M. L., Darden, T., Lee, H., & Pedersen, L. G. (1995) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.470117 · Cited by 22,514
Guvench, O., Mallajosyula, S. S., Raman, E. P., Hatcher, E., Vanommeslaeghe, K., Foster, T. J., Jamison, F. W., & MacKerell, A. D. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct200328p · Cited by 699
Atomic-level description of ubiquitin folding
Piana, S., Lindorff-Larsen, K., & Shaw, D. E. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218321110 · Cited by 326
A gating mechanism of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels
Calimet, N., Simoes, M., Changeux, J.-P., Karplus, M., Taly, A., & Cecchini, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1313785110 · Cited by 150
CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed
Hwang, W., Austin, S. L., Blondel, A., Boittier, E. D., Boresch, S., Buck, M., Buckner, J., Caflisch, A., Chang, H.-T., Cheng, X., et al. (2024) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04100 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinbach, P. J., & Brooks, B. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 667-683
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W1975945758
- Cited by
- 1,147
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New spherical‐cutoff methods for long‐range forces in macromolecular simulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.540150702
- The paper
- Steinbach, P. J., & Brooks, B. R. (1994). New spherical‐cutoff methods for long‐range forces in macromolecular simulation. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540150702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.