Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,147

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

New spherical‐cutoff methods for long‐range forces in macromolecular simulation

Steinbach, Peter J., Brooks, Bernard R.·1994·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Abstract

New atom‐ and group‐based spherical‐cutoff methods have been developed for the treatment of nonbonded interactions in molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. A new atom‐based method, force switching, leaves short‐range forces unaltered by adding a constant to the potential energy, switching forces smoothly to zero over a specified range. A simple improvement to group‐based cutoffs is presented: Switched group‐shifting shifts the group–group potential energy by a constant before being switched smoothly to zero. Also introduced are generalizations of atom‐based force shifting, which adds a constant to the Coulomb force between two charges. These new approaches are compared to existing methods by evaluating the energy of a model hydrogen‐bonding system consisting of two N‐methyl acetamide molecules and by full MD simulation. Thirty‐five 150 ps simulations of carboxymyoglobin (MbCO) hydrated by 350 water molecules indicate that the new methods and atom‐based shifting are each able to approximate no‐cutoff results when a cutoff at or beyond 12 Å is used. However, atom‐based potential‐energy switching and truncation unacceptably contaminate group–group electrostatic interactions. Group‐based potential truncation should not be used in the presence of explicit water or other mobile electrostatic dipoles because energy is not a state function with this method, resulting in severe heating (about 4 K/ps in the simulations of hydrated MbCO). The distance‐dependent dielectric (ϵ ∝︁ r) is found to alter the temperature dependence of protein dynamics, suppressing anharmonic motion at high temperatures. Force switching and force shifting are the best atom‐based spherical cutoffs, whereas switched group‐shifting is the preferred group‐based method. To achieve realistic simulations, increasing the cutoff distance from 7.5 to 12 Å or beyond is much more important than the differences among the three best cutoff methods. © 1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.540150702

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,147

Metadata

Authors
Steinbach, P. J., & Brooks, B. R.
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-07
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
667-683
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W1975945758
Cited by
1,147
References
0
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New spherical‐cutoff methods for long‐range forces in macromolecular simulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.540150702
The paper
Steinbach, P. J., & Brooks, B. R. (1994). New spherical‐cutoff methods for long‐range forces in macromolecular simulation. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540150702

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.