Cited by 52Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Dialectical behavior therapy in an intensive outpatient program with a mixed-diagnostic sample

Ritschel, Lorie A., Cheavens, Jennifer S., Nelson, Juliet·2012·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objectives Intensive outpatient programs (IOPs) have become increasingly common for treating highly distressed patients, and a burgeoning number of IOPs are based on, or informed by, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT). The goal of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of DBT in a community mental health center IOP for patients with heterogeneous diagnoses. Method Using a within-subjects design, we examined changes in depression, anxiety, mindfulness, and hope during DBT treatment in a community mental health center in the Midwestern United States. The final sample comprised 56 participants (59% female) ranging in age from 18 to 73 years, with a mean age of 36.8 years (standard deviation = 13.7). The majority of participants (80%) met criteria for a mood disorder, just over half met criteria for an anxiety disorder, and 20% met criteria for comorbid substance abuse or dependence. Over half met criteria for more than one diagnosis. Length of treatment varied based on the needs of the individual patient; treatment ranged from 2 to 16 weeks, with an average stay of 6 weeks. Results Depression and anxiety scores decreased significantly and hope scores increased significantly over the course of treatment (all p's Conclusions Results suggest that this DBT-informed intervention was effective in reducing depression and anxiety and increasing hope. Because of the move away from inpatient hospitalizations over the last few decades, it is incumbent on the field to find alte…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.20863

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 64 · Cited by 52

Authors
Ritschel, L. A., Cheavens, J. S., & Nelson, J.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Bert Nash Community Mental Health Center
Corresponding author
Ritschel, Lorie A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
221-235
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W1941905500
Cited by
52
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, intensive outpatient treatment, depression, anxiety, hope, mindfulness, community mental health centers, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use comorbidity, group therapy, treatment effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Behavior Therapy, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Centers, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Mood Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review