Cited by 76Emotions and Moral BehaviorPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The Impact of Shame on the Therapeutic Alliance and Intimate Relationships: Shame, Therapeutic Alliance, and Intimate Relationships

Black, Rebecca S. A., Curran, David, Dyer, Kevin F. W.·2013·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the role of shame coping styles and state shame in predicting the therapeutic alliance and intimate relationship functioning in individuals with mental health problems. METHOD: A sample of 50 treatment-receiving adults aged 21 to 67 years with a mix of common mental health difficulties was recruited from a clinical psychology service. Participants were given questionnaire measures of shame states, shame coping styles, intimate relationship functioning, and the therapeutic alliance. RESULTS: Regression analyses indicated that the shame coping strategy of physical and psychological withdrawal was the primary risk factor for development of a less effective therapeutic alliance. Both withdrawal and attack self coping styles were significant predictors of impaired intimate relationship functioning. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have implications for the theoretical role of shame in mental health presentations as well as the potential for internalizing shame coping styles (i.e., withdrawal, attack self) to act as a barrier to successful therapy and interpersonal relationships. The inclusion of shame-focused assessments and interventions in the initial stages of treatment with clients exhibiting these strategies could improve prognosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.21959

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Factors such as dismissive attachment, perfectionism, shame, and devaluation have tended to predict worse outcome in treatment of narcissistic personality disorder.

    “Factors, such as dismissive attachment, perfectionism, shame, and devaluation, have tended to predict worse outcome (90–93).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 76

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hart, 2007, The self-conscious emotions, 114
  2. Marshall, 1994, The state shame and guilt scale
  3. Snell, 2002, New directions in the psychology of intimate relations: Research and theory
  4. Tracey, 2007, The self-conscious emotions, 3

Authors
Black, R. S. A., Curran, D., & Dyer, K. F. W.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Dyer, Kevin F. W.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-04
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
646-654
ISSN
0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1493923106
Cited by
76
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
shame, therapeutic relationship, withdrawal, common mental disorders, treatment prognosis, interpersonal relationships
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Cooperative Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Sexual Partners, Shame, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review