SUSTAINING INNOVATIONS IN COMMUNITY PREVENTION SYSTEMS: A DATA‐INFORMED SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY
Abstract
This article presents a sustainability strategy, its implementation protocols, and a pilot study of implementation and sustainability readiness. The strategy is guided by a conceptual framework that integrates (a) a strategy for sustaining prevention infrastructure and interventions and (b) a planning and evaluation process known as Getting To Outcomes. Data‐informed decision making is key to this strategy, which includes initial assessment of sustainability capacity and sustainable innovation characteristics, and progresses through planning, implementation, evaluation, and continuous quality improvement to sustain targeted innovations. A support system for implementing the strategy, including a toolkit, primer, electronic tools, and training and technical assistance, is described. Lessons learned from a pilot study for future testing and implementation of the strategy are also discussed. In sum, the article presents a conceptual‐based strategy to sustainability, an innovative support system, and lessons learned that have important implications for improving the evaluation and practice of sustainability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These sustainability assessment and planning strategies have only begun to be evaluated in small pilot studies.
“However, these strategies have only begun to be evaluated in small pilot studies (19, 65).”
From The Sustainability of Evidence-Based Interventions and Practices in Public Health and Health Care (2018) · cites this paper as [65]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Johnson, K., Collins, D., & Wandersman, A.
- Affiliations
- Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Knowlton
- Venue
- Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-25
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 322-340
- ISSN
- 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6629
- OpenAlex
- W1830299178
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- sustainability strategy, data-informed decision making, technical assistance, continuous quality improvement, lessons learned
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review