Cited by 11Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCrime Patterns and Interventions

If momma ain’t happy with the mentoring relationship, ain’t nobody happy with the mentoring relationship: Parental satisfaction as a predictor of mentoring match strength and length

Shamblen, Stephen R., Courser, Matthew W., Schweinhart, April M., Thompson, Kirsten·2020·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Much evidence exists on whether an individual's perception of a match relationship impacts match strength and length, but relatively less is known about whether parental perceptions of the match (i.e., whether the match is meeting their goals) impacts the length and strength of mentoring relationships. These relationships were examined in a sample of 350 newly formed youth-mentor matches who completed multiple measures of match strength and satisfaction with the match. Parents/guardians were also surveyed about their level of satisfaction with the match. The primary finding of this paper was that parent/guardian dissatisfaction with the match relationships meeting goals was the only significant predictor of a higher likelihood of match closure. Although youth and mentor self-reports of satisfaction with how match time was spent were the strongest predictors of volunteer and youth match strength ratings, parent/guardian satisfaction with the match relationship also remained a strong predictor of match strength. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.22304

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parent/guardian satisfaction with the mentoring goals in BBBS America mentoring programs predicts match strength and duration, whereas parent/guardian dissatisfaction predicted match closure.

    “Similarly, parent/guardian satisfaction with the mentoring goals in BBBS America mentoring programs predicts match strength and duration, as derived from mentors’ and mentees’ reports, whereas parent/guardian dissatisfaction predicted match closure [180].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 11

Authors
Shamblen, S. R., Courser, M. W., Schweinhart, A. M., & Thompson, K.
Affiliations
Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
Corresponding author
Shamblen, Stephen R.
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12-24
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
879-890
ISSN
  • 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6629
OpenAlex
W2997046865
Cited by
11
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (#2013‐JU‐FX‐0010)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
mentoring relationships, parental satisfaction, parental attitudes, volunteer mentors
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Female, Humans, Mentors, Middle Aged, Mothers, Parents, Personal Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review