If momma ain’t happy with the mentoring relationship, ain’t nobody happy with the mentoring relationship: Parental satisfaction as a predictor of mentoring match strength and length
Abstract
Much evidence exists on whether an individual's perception of a match relationship impacts match strength and length, but relatively less is known about whether parental perceptions of the match (i.e., whether the match is meeting their goals) impacts the length and strength of mentoring relationships. These relationships were examined in a sample of 350 newly formed youth-mentor matches who completed multiple measures of match strength and satisfaction with the match. Parents/guardians were also surveyed about their level of satisfaction with the match. The primary finding of this paper was that parent/guardian dissatisfaction with the match relationships meeting goals was the only significant predictor of a higher likelihood of match closure. Although youth and mentor self-reports of satisfaction with how match time was spent were the strongest predictors of volunteer and youth match strength ratings, parent/guardian satisfaction with the match relationship also remained a strong predictor of match strength. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parent/guardian satisfaction with the mentoring goals in BBBS America mentoring programs predicts match strength and duration, whereas parent/guardian dissatisfaction predicted match closure.
“Similarly, parent/guardian satisfaction with the mentoring goals in BBBS America mentoring programs predicts match strength and duration, as derived from mentors’ and mentees’ reports, whereas parent/guardian dissatisfaction predicted match closure [180].”
From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [180]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Shamblen, S. R., Courser, M. W., Schweinhart, A. M., & Thompson, K.
- Affiliations
- Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shamblen, Stephen R.
- Venue
- Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-24
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 879-890
- ISSN
- 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6629
- OpenAlex
- W2997046865
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (#2013‐JU‐FX‐0010)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- mentoring relationships, parental satisfaction, parental attitudes, volunteer mentors
- MeSH terms
- Mentoring, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Female, Humans, Mentors, Middle Aged, Mothers, Parents, Personal Satisfaction, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review