The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A reduction in the in situ rates of oxygen and glucose consumption of cells in EMT6/Ro spheroids during growth
Abstract
The rates of consumption of oxygen and glucose by EMT6/Ro cells in multi‐cellular spheroids were measured at various times during normal growth. In situ spheroid cellular consumption rates were similar to those of exponentially growing single cells up to a spheroid diameter of 150 μm. Further growth resulted in decreases in the rates of both oxygen and glucose consumption which were correlated with the increase in spheroid diameter and cell number. At a diameter of 1300 μm, both rates of cellular consumption had decreased by a factor of 2.5. The rates of consumption per unit of nonnecrotic spheroid volume decreased in a similar manner. Measurements with single cells demonstrated that the rate of oxygen consumption was coupled with glucose concentration, and vice versa. The rates of consumption for cells dissociated from small spheroids indicated that there was some effect of the spheroid environment. As the spheroids grew, however, association in the spheroid structure accounted for a smaller proportion of the total observed reduction in the rates of nutrient consumption. The presence of central necrosis also appeared to have no effect on the rates of consumption of these nutrients. Spheroid‐derived cells showed a decrease in cell volume with growth as the cells accumulated in a quiescent state. Measurements with single cells demonstrated that oxygen and glucose consumption were correlated with cell volume and with the development of nonproliferating cells. We conclude that the observed decrease in oxygen and glucose consumption with growth in spheroids is largely due to the progressive accumulation of cells in a quiescent state characterized by an inherently lower cellular rate of nutrient utilization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxygen tensions in multicell spheroids of two cell lines
Mueller-Klieser, W. F., & Sutherland, R. M. (1982) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1982.41 · Cited by 133
Self-citation
Cited by
Micro-dissected tumor tissues on chip: an ex vivo method for drug testing and personalized therapy
Astolfi, M., Péant, B., Lateef, M. A., Rousset, N., Kendall-Dupont, J., Carmona, E., Monet, F., Saad, F., Provencher, D., Mes-Masson, A.-M., et al. (2016) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c5lc01108f · Cited by 182
Groebe, K., & Mueller-Klieser, W. (1991) · European Biophysics Journal · doi:10.1007/bf00196343 · Cited by 104
Microencapsulated human hepatoma (HepG2) cells: In vitro growth and protein release
Uludag, H., & Sefton, M. V. (1993) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820271002 · Cited by 74
In silico estimates of the free energy rates in growing tumor spheroids
Narayanan, H., Verner, S. N., Mills, K. L., Kemkemer, R., & Garikipati, K. (2010) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/19/194122 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Freyer, J. P., & Sutherland, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 516-524
- ISSN
- 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4652
- OpenAlex
- W1973899461
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A reduction in the in situ rates of oxygen and glucose consumption of cells in EMT6/Ro spheroids during growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcp.1041240323
- The paper
- Freyer, J. P., & Sutherland, R. M. (1985). A reduction in the in situ rates of oxygen and glucose consumption of cells in EMT6/Ro spheroids during growth. Journal of Cellular Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041240323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.