Cited by 64Bone health and treatmentsBone health and osteoporosis researchBone Metabolism and Diseases

Paradoxical side effects of bisphosphonates on the skeleton: What do we know and what can we do?

Vargas‐Franco, Jorge W., Castaneda, Beatriz, Rédiní, Françoise, Gómez, David F., Heymann, Dominique, Lézot, Frédéric·2018·Journal of Cellular Physiology

Abstract

Bisphosphonates are considered the most effective drugs for controlling adult and pediatric osteolytic diseases. Although they have been used successfully for many years, several side effects, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, delayed dental eruption, atypical femoral fracture, and alterations to the bone growth system, have been described. After an overview of nitrogenous bisphosphonate, the purpose of this article is to describe their mechanisms of action and current applications, review the preclinical and clinical evidence of their side effects in the skeleton ("what we know"), and describe current recommendations for preventing and managing these effects ("what we can do"). Finally, promising future directions on how to limit the occurrence of these side effects will be presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcp.26465

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bisphosphonates inhibit the stimulatory activity of osteoclasts on osteoblast differentiation, and as a consequence, patients on these drugs suffer from a blockade of de novo bone formation.

    “biphosphonates inhibit the stimulatory activity of osteoclasts on osteoblast differentiation and, as a consequence, patients on these drugs suffer from a blockade of de novo bone formation [12,70]”

    From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [70]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vargas‐Franco, J. W., Castaneda, B., Rédiní, F., Gómez, D. F., Heymann, D., & Lézot, F.
Affiliations
  • UMR‐1238, INSERM, Equipe 1 Faculté de Médecine de l'Université de Nantes Nantes France
  • INSERM, UMR‐1138, Equipe 5 Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers Paris France
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
Corresponding author
Lézot, Frédéric
Venue
Journal of Cellular Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-07
Volume
233
Issue
8
Pages
5696-5715
ISSN
  • 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4652
OpenAlex
W2782861663
Cited by
64
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cellular Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
bisphosphonates, osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femoral fractures, bone growth disorders, osteolytic diseases, adverse drug reactions, mechanism of action
MeSH terms
Animals, Diphosphonates, Humans, Osteonecrosis, Skeleton, Bone Density Conservation Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review