Cited by 35Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phenotypic differences between people varying in muscularity

Open access

Abstract

Background: Body mass is the primary metabolic compartment related to a vast number of clinical indices and predictions. The extent to which skeletal muscle (SM), a major body mass component, varies between people of the same sex, weight, height, and age is largely unknown. The current study aimed to explore the magnitude of muscularity variation present in adults and to examine if variation in muscularity associates with other body composition and metabolic measures. Methods: Muscularity was defined as the difference (residual) between a person's actual and model‐predicted SM mass after controlling for their weight, height, and age. SM prediction models were developed using data from a convenience sample of 492 healthy non‐Hispanic (NH) White adults (ages 18–80 years) who had total body SM and SM surrogate, appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST), measured with magnetic resonance imaging and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry, respectively; residual SM (SM R ) and ALST were expressed in kilograms and kilograms per square meter. ALST mass was also evaluated in a population sample of 8623 NH‐White adults in the 1999–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Associations between muscularity and variation in the residual mass of other major organs and tissues and resting energy expenditure were evaluated in the convenience sample. Results: The SM, on average, constituted the largest fraction of body weight in men and women up to respective BMIs of 35 and 25 kg/m 2 . SM in the convenience sample varied widely with a median of 31.2 kg and an SM R inter‐quartile range/min/max of 3.35 kg/−10.1 kg/9.0 kg in men and 21.1 kg and 2.59 kg/−7.2 kg/7.5 kg in women; per cent of body weight as SM at 25th and 75th percentiles for men were 33.1% and 39.6%; corresponding values in women were 24.2% and 30.8%; results were similar for SM R indices and for ALST measures in the convenience and population samples. Greater muscularity in the convenience sample was accompanied by a smaller waist circumference (men/women: P < 0.001/=0.085) and visceral adipose tissue ( P = 0.014/0.599), larger liver ( P = 0.065/<0.001), kidneys ( P = 0.051/<0.009), and bone mineral ( P < 0.001/<0.001), and larger magnitude resting energy expenditure ( P < 0.001/<0.001) than predicted for the same sex, age, weight, and height. Conclusions: Muscle mass is the largest body compartment in most adults without obesity and is widely variable in mass across people of similar body size and age; and high muscularity is accompanied by distinct body composition and metabolic characteristics. This previously unrecognized heterogeneity in muscularity in the general population has important clinical and research implications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcsm.12959

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On average, people with obesity have a higher absolute skeletal muscle mass and strength than those with normal weight, especially in weight-bearing muscles.

    “On average, people with obesity have a higher absolute skeletal muscle mass and strength than those with a normal weight, especially in weight‐bearing muscles.”

    From Strategies for minimizing muscle loss during use of incretin‐mimetic drugs for treatment of obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results (Skeletal muscle; page unavailable) report a linear relationship between skeletal muscle mass index and BMI, supporting the claim's direction for muscle mass. The paper does not establish that people with obesity have greater muscle strength than normal-weight people or that the difference is especially pronounced in weight-bearing muscles; searches for strength and weight-bearing muscles found no such result. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1001/jama.2012.185445 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000395 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/oby.23090 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.06.003 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/ajpa.20262 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/ijo.2008.87 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/ijo.2012.218 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/obr.12718 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01019.x · DOI
  10. 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2002.00057.x · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41430-018-0151-9 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1172/JCI114857 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.3945/ajcn.112.036350 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/obr.12254 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/oby.2011.40 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/ijo.2013.1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/s41430-018-0150-x · DOI
  18. 10.1002/ajhb.23252 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/ajcn/76.2.378 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.3390/nu8060322 · DOI
  21. 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27402 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.3945/ajcn.114.088831 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/ajhb.22653 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/ijo.2009.184 · DOI
  25. 10.1186/s13293‐018‐0189‐3 · DOI
  26. 10.3389/fendo.2020.00031 · DOI
  27. 10.11005/jbm.2014.21.1.29 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41430-018-0214-y · DOI
  29. 10.1242/jeb.01548 · DOI
  30. 10.1172/JCI113159 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/jcsm.12899 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Heymsfield, S. B., Smith, B., Chung, E. A., Watts, K. L., Gonzalez, M. C., Yang, S., Heo, M., Thomas, D. M., Turner, D., Bosy‐Westphal, A., & Müller, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • United States Military Academy (US)
  • Post‐Graduate Program in Health and Behavior Catholic University of Pelotas Pelotas RS Brazil
  • Clemson University (US)
  • United States Army (US)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Corresponding author
Heymsfield, Steven B.
Venue
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-02-15
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
1100-1112
ISSN
  • 2190-5991 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-6009
OpenAlex
W4212974723
Cited by
35
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK109008, P30DK072476, P30DK040561)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
muscularity, skeletal muscle mass, body composition, resting energy expenditure, visceral adipose tissue, liver mass, renal mass, body mass index, sex differences, interindividual variability, healthy adults, waist circumference, sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Absorptiometry, Photon, Body Mass Index, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review