The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phenotypic differences between people varying in muscularity
Open accessAbstract
Background: Body mass is the primary metabolic compartment related to a vast number of clinical indices and predictions. The extent to which skeletal muscle (SM), a major body mass component, varies between people of the same sex, weight, height, and age is largely unknown. The current study aimed to explore the magnitude of muscularity variation present in adults and to examine if variation in muscularity associates with other body composition and metabolic measures. Methods: Muscularity was defined as the difference (residual) between a person's actual and model‐predicted SM mass after controlling for their weight, height, and age. SM prediction models were developed using data from a convenience sample of 492 healthy non‐Hispanic (NH) White adults (ages 18–80 years) who had total body SM and SM surrogate, appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST), measured with magnetic resonance imaging and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry, respectively; residual SM (SM R ) and ALST were expressed in kilograms and kilograms per square meter. ALST mass was also evaluated in a population sample of 8623 NH‐White adults in the 1999–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Associations between muscularity and variation in the residual mass of other major organs and tissues and resting energy expenditure were evaluated in the convenience sample. Results: The SM, on average, constituted the largest fraction of body weight in men and women up to respective BMIs of 35 and 25 kg/m 2 . SM in the convenience sample varied widely with a median of 31.2 kg and an SM R inter‐quartile range/min/max of 3.35 kg/−10.1 kg/9.0 kg in men and 21.1 kg and 2.59 kg/−7.2 kg/7.5 kg in women; per cent of body weight as SM at 25th and 75th percentiles for men were 33.1% and 39.6%; corresponding values in women were 24.2% and 30.8%; results were similar for SM R indices and for ALST measures in the convenience and population samples. Greater muscularity in the convenience sample was accompanied by a smaller waist circumference (men/women: P < 0.001/=0.085) and visceral adipose tissue ( P = 0.014/0.599), larger liver ( P = 0.065/<0.001), kidneys ( P = 0.051/<0.009), and bone mineral ( P < 0.001/<0.001), and larger magnitude resting energy expenditure ( P < 0.001/<0.001) than predicted for the same sex, age, weight, and height. Conclusions: Muscle mass is the largest body compartment in most adults without obesity and is widely variable in mass across people of similar body size and age; and high muscularity is accompanied by distinct body composition and metabolic characteristics. This previously unrecognized heterogeneity in muscularity in the general population has important clinical and research implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
On average, people with obesity have a higher absolute skeletal muscle mass and strength than those with normal weight, especially in weight-bearing muscles.
“On average, people with obesity have a higher absolute skeletal muscle mass and strength than those with a normal weight, especially in weight‐bearing muscles.”
From Strategies for minimizing muscle loss during use of incretin‐mimetic drugs for treatment of obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
The Results (Skeletal muscle; page unavailable) report a linear relationship between skeletal muscle mass index and BMI, supporting the claim's direction for muscle mass. The paper does not establish that people with obesity have greater muscle strength than normal-weight people or that the difference is especially pronounced in weight-bearing muscles; searches for strength and weight-bearing muscles found no such result. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr
Janssen, I., Heymsfield, S. B., Wang, Z., & Ross, R. (2000) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.2000.89.1.81 · Cited by 3,087
Self-citationA new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals
Mifflin, M., St Jeor, S., Hill, L., Scott, B., Daugherty, S., & Koh, Y. (1990) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/51.2.241 · Cited by 2,544
Heymsfield, S. B., Gallagher, D., Kotler, D. P., Wang, Z., Allison, D. B., & Heshka, S. (2002) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.2002.282.1.e132 · Cited by 262
Self-citationKim, J., Heshka, S., Gallagher, D., Kotler, D. P., Mayer, L., Albu, J., Shen, W., Freda, P. U., & Heymsfield, S. B. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00260.2004 · Cited by 205
Self-citationReference Values for Skeletal Muscle Mass – Current Concepts and Methodological Considerations
Walowski, C. O., Braun, W., Maisch, M. J., Jensen, B., Peine, S., Norman, K., Müller, M. J., & Bosy-Westphal, A. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12030755 · Cited by 200
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1001/jama.2012.185445 · DOI
- 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000395 · DOI
- 10.1002/oby.23090 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.20262 · DOI
- 10.1038/ijo.2008.87 · DOI
- 10.1038/ijo.2012.218 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/obr.12718 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01019.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2002.00057.x · DOI
- 10.1038/s41430-018-0151-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1172/JCI114857 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3945/ajcn.112.036350 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/obr.12254 · DOI
- 10.1038/oby.2011.40 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ijo.2013.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41430-018-0150-x · DOI
- 10.1002/ajhb.23252 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajcn/76.2.378 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/nu8060322 · DOI
- 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3945/ajcn.114.088831 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajhb.22653 · DOI
- 10.1038/ijo.2009.184 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13293‐018‐0189‐3 · DOI
- 10.3389/fendo.2020.00031 · DOI
- 10.11005/jbm.2014.21.1.29 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41430-018-0214-y · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.01548 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI113159 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcsm.12899 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strategies for minimizing muscle loss during use of incretin‐mimetic drugs for treatment of obesity
Mechanick, J. I., Butsch, W. S., Christensen, S. M., Hamdy, O., Li, Z., Prado, C. M., & Heymsfield, S. B. (2025) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.13841 · Cited by 149
Self-citationHeymsfield, S. B., Prado, C. M., Gonzalez, M. C., Cederholm, T., Jensen, G. L., Barazzoni, R., & Compher, C. (2022) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1002/jpen.2414 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heymsfield, S. B., Smith, B., Chung, E. A., Watts, K. L., Gonzalez, M. C., Yang, S., Heo, M., Thomas, D. M., Turner, D., Bosy‐Westphal, A., & Müller, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
- United States Military Academy (US)
- Post‐Graduate Program in Health and Behavior Catholic University of Pelotas Pelotas RS Brazil
- Clemson University (US)
- United States Army (US)
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Heymsfield, Steven B.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-02-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1100-1112
- ISSN
- 2190-5991 (ISSN-L)
- 2190-6009
- PMC
- PMC8978029
- OpenAlex
- W4212974723
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK109008, P30DK072476, P30DK040561)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- muscularity, skeletal muscle mass, body composition, resting energy expenditure, visceral adipose tissue, liver mass, renal mass, body mass index, sex differences, interindividual variability, healthy adults, waist circumference, sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Absorptiometry, Photon, Body Mass Index, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review